1 posted on
06/01/2007 7:48:11 AM PDT by
Kuksool
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-26 last
To: firebrand; juliej; rmlew
To: Kuksool
There is absolutely ZERO chance of Bloomberg being able to do whats alleged here.
Its laughable to even suggest it, and a reasonable question is what exactly was the author smoking/drinking/snorting/injecting to even come up with the idea in the first place.
59 posted on
06/01/2007 9:32:04 AM PDT by
Badeye
(You know its a kook site when they ban the word 'kook')
To: Kuksool
Rumors abound that Michael Bloomberg might spend a billion dollars running for the White House as an Independent, putting him on a competitive footing with the major party candidates. That might make it possible for Bloomberg to win several states and prevent anybody from winning a majority of the Electoral College votes. I doubt that BloomingIdiotberg could even win as mayor of New York City again, much less actually win a state. I suppose theoretically he might be able to win a third as many states as Perot did in either 92 or 96. Let's see, how many did Perot win?
To: Kuksool
73 posted on
06/01/2007 10:19:31 AM PDT by
WinOne4TheGipper
(Consult your doctor before taking tagline. Do not take tagline with alcohol.)
To: Kuksool
I don’t think Bloomie has what it takes to win even one state.
76 posted on
06/01/2007 10:48:41 AM PDT by
HitmanLV
("Lord, give me chastity and temperance, but not now." - St. Augustine)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-26 last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson