Reading the party entirely wrong AGAIN. Saying amnesty's a "personal" issue wouldn't matter unless you're a dictator.
Amnesty! Amnesty! Amnesty!
1 posted on
05/31/2007 11:46:56 PM PDT by
Baladas
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-38 last
To: Baladas
"People shouldn't fear our capacity to uphold our motto, E Pluribus Unum," Bush told McClatchy Newspapers.I've thought about this since my
reply on a similar thread.
That article even has this there...
The Latin phrase means "Out of many, one."Perhaps Bush doesn't understand what the FF were getting at. The FF meant that out of the many States one nation would be formed. They didn't mean that the many nations/countries of the world would form into one global union/government.
If he does believe that then the "one world government" antagonists are right after all.
To: Baladas; All
Can I have my two votes for this fool back now?
32 posted on
06/01/2007 1:42:10 AM PDT by
backhoe
(Fred Thompson- because No Other will Do...)
To: Baladas
I'm sorry people, but I can't reconcile the sacrifice of our soldiers when our government is going to simply dissolve our borders overnight and disintegrate the country. Why are our soldiers dying in Iraq to protect us when our leaders have no intention of protecting our borders? This doesn't make sense unless it's part of something more sinister of a conspiratorial nature. It doesn't make sense...
There is no way around this. This bill... from a historial perspective of border enforcement of this administration and the absolute lack of intent for sanctuary cities/states to enforce the laws that already exist, this bill is amnesty. The problem won't change, it will become worse and worse because they won't or don't have the courage or will to address a real solution. It's surrender.
And surrendering our borders is the ultimate insult to our brave and courageous heros in our armed forces who are dying to protect this nation. How can we allow the government to betray all of us like this?
With a nod to "Country Joe and the Fish". Hopefully they've explored the dark mysteries of personal hygiene since this tune was last popular.
***
1..2..3...What are they dying for?
What's this crap with AMNESTY?
GOP's gonna screw you and me...
and it's 5..6..7..
Twenty Million illegals...
Well they're on their way, WELCOME, JOSE!
Yippee!
GOP's gonna die...
***
And with 20 million new socialist voters, the GOP is going to die, nailing their casket closed in the next election. My mind is spinning. What are they thinking?!?
34 posted on
06/01/2007 2:23:38 AM PDT by
Caipirabob
(Communists... Socialists... Democrats...Traitors... Who can tell the difference?)
To: Baladas
Points to Texas’ diversity For Bush, the fight over immigration reform is a personal one unlike Social Security or education reform, which were mostly political.
So gb is willing to die on the hill of fighting for amnesty, but Soical Security reform was
“Mostly political”?
U-N-B-E-L-I-E-V-A-B-L-E
I think gb and rove and the bushian elements of the Republican Party have drank the kool aid laced with stupid pills...
37 posted on
06/01/2007 3:50:52 AM PDT by
padre35
(GWB choose Amnesty as his hill to die on, not Social Security reform.....that speaks much)
To: Baladas
IMPEACH (New World Order) Bush, NOW!!!
41 posted on
06/01/2007 4:18:18 AM PDT by
blam
To: Baladas
Slaves were hard working, did the work that Americans wouldn’t do, and had strong family values.
Based on that, I guess the President would support slavery, no?
43 posted on
06/01/2007 4:30:30 AM PDT by
oldbill
To: Baladas
Where are chiefs Pontiac, Sitting Bull and Crazy horse when you need them?
Now I know some of the rage that drove Pontiac to war.
44 posted on
06/01/2007 4:53:58 AM PDT by
Al Gator
(Refusing to "stoop to your enemy's level", gets you cut off at the knees.)
To: Baladas
"If you want to scare the American people, what you say is the bill's an amnesty bill," Bush said during a stop in Glynco, Ga. "That's empty political rhetoric, trying to frighten our citizens." Sorry, NO, Mr. President. It is your rhetoric that is frightening our citizens because you are trying to give away the entire united States of America with YOUR amnesty.
"If you want to scare the American people, what you say is" the TRUTH about your amnesty bill.
45 posted on
06/01/2007 4:55:07 AM PDT by
TLI
( ITINERIS IMPENDEO VALHALLA)
To: Baladas
I would like to ask Bush at what point do we say, enough the country full and we can’t take in anymore? This legislation has the potential to flood the nation with millions upon millions of poor, uneducated, non-english speaking immigrants. How many can this country absorb?
47 posted on
06/01/2007 5:11:46 AM PDT by
engrpat
To: Baladas
Personal? No doubt. I’m sure there’s a big payday waiting for him once he leaves office.
49 posted on
06/01/2007 5:13:23 AM PDT by
Wolfie
To: Baladas
Yep he’s a liberal
Spewing this diversity crap is a dead giveaway.
To: Baladas
U.S. Constitution, Article 4 Section 4:"The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government,
and shall protect each of them against Invasion;"
Invasion: \In*va"sion\, n. [L. invasio: cf. F. invasion. See Invade.] [1913 Webster]
1. The act of invading; the act of encroaching upon the rights or possessions of another; encroachment; trespass.
52 posted on
06/01/2007 5:24:38 AM PDT by
Travis McGee
(--- www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com ---)
To: Baladas
“gassing about....”. No bias here! These mexicans are entering the US illegally and what they want is to take over. They are in-your-face people and they are only waiting for the bill to pass so they can turn on us. Thank you, Mr. President. One mexican can twist an entire family and there is visible proof of this right here, right now and very public. If there ever was any great sympathy for mexicans among the American people, it is surely dwindling fast.
55 posted on
06/01/2007 5:41:58 AM PDT by
twonie
(Keep your guns - and stockpile ammo.)
To: Baladas
If by "amnesty", you mean "Impeachment and removal from office", then I'm all for it.
66 posted on
06/01/2007 7:56:14 AM PDT by
Psycho_Bunny
(If by "amnesty" you mean "Impeachment and removal from office", then I'm all for it.)
To: Baladas
In addition to arguing the merits, the two noted the political damage to the Republican Party after California in 1994 passed Proposition 187, a measure denying many public services to illegal immigrants. "The GOP won the governor's mansion in the short term, but alienated the fastest-growing constituency in the state," they said. Political analysis was all wrong.
74 posted on
06/01/2007 9:31:57 AM PDT by
WOSG
(Stop Illegal Immigration. Call your Senator today. Senate Switchboard at 202-224-3121.))
To: Baladas
I'm sorry, but the gag alert was not sufficient.
These 3rd grade talking points required a minimum of a head-spinning, projectile vomiting alert.
85 posted on
06/01/2007 8:56:57 PM PDT by
truthkeeper
(It's the borders, stupid.)
To: Baladas
86 posted on
06/01/2007 9:48:05 PM PDT by
Jason_b
To: Baladas
re: Bush, for the first time, is putting opponents on notice that he's going to call them out on their xenophobia if he needs to.)))
Is that a fact.
Here's a suggestion for the anti-amnestry crowd--what if the Minutemen did an undercover investigation on the Bush family's habits of hiring black market servants? You wouldn't have to look farther than the Crawford Ranch--I'll bet there are plenty of unlawful employees.
Remember how he wouldn't hire Linda Chavez because she had illegal help?
If he won't enforce the law, maybe it's because he knows he's personally breaking the law.
88 posted on
06/02/2007 8:34:50 AM PDT by
Mamzelle
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-38 last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson