Chairman Clinton Wants To Remake American Society (Rush On Hillary The Socialist Chairman Alert)

RUSH: The Drive-By Media is not talking about this, either, ladies and gentlemen. Mrs. Bill Clinton, Hillary Clinton, essentially admitted she wants to replace American society. It is profound what she is admitting to out there. We've got a new little update theme song that we want to share with you before we get into Hillary news, takeoff on a Tammy Wynette tune, Stood By My Man here.

After all, ladies and gentlemen, she did say that there are things worse than infidelity. She actually said this. This is a quote. "It's time to replace American society." Have you noticed the way Mrs. Clinton has been dressing lately? She's been wearing these Mao suits. She looks like Chairman Mao out there. She's wearing these jackets with the Mao collar. So we call her Chairman Hillary here. The smartest woman in the world, she made it abundantly clear that we have to place the "on your own" society, which is the George Bush model, with her new model, "we're all in it together" society. Because she says fairness doesn't just happen. It requires the right governmental policies in order for fairness. And, see, fairness is one of these illusive concepts anyway. But to liberals, fairness is equality of outcomes.

They are obsessed with equality. They are obsessed with everybody being the same. Boys and girls are not different. Multiculturalism is all about making sure that everybody, every religion is the same, every cultural cusp is the same, none is better than the other, none is worse than the other, because they just will not make such judgments. So when Mrs. Clinton starts talking about fairness, that's a code word for government's going to come in and we're going to legislate and mandate equality of outcomes. What does it mean to you in real terms? Well, the great leader, Chairman Hillary, assures us that the new society, this "we're all in it together" society means prosperity to all. Every American will get affordable health insurance bestowed by the same big government types that created the problems that we have now. Corporations will be punished. She's making no secret of this. This is not the first time she's said it. She says that there will be no more special breaks. Oil companies are going to be punished the most. Oil companies will be required to invest in technologies that she and government deem appropriate, or they will face higher taxes. Corporate CEOs will have their paychecks monitored by the public, and they will be open to public challenge. These are stunning admissions that she's making, and I'll tell you what, the fact that the Drive-Bys are not pumping it up and making a big deal out of is because they know how damaging this could be if it were given wide play. Some out there I'm sure would love to celebrate this and ring the bells, but they don't dare.

My gosh, this stuff hasn't been proposed ever in this country in such open, blatant terms. She goes on and on and on about how this is just such an unfair society, this "on your own" business, it leads to inequality, it leads to some having more than others. And the reason some get more than others is that the people have more steal from the others, and it's just not fair, it just isn't right. So what she favors is collectivism. If you study collectivism, communism, socialism, wherever it is, and has been around the world, you will find a trail of human misery, economic collapse, and failure in its wake. But she says the government can be the great equalizer, and it can't. I ask this question again. In less than 200 years the United States of America has surpassed every population group, every other country, every system of government on earth by unlocking one thing, and that is the vast potential of individual effort, encouraged by freedom.

How anybody can look at this country and want to destroy it and tear it down or remake its society is beyond most people's grasp. Why would they want to destroy this? You have to understand there are people that do, and that's in large part what the immigration debate represents, the immigration bill represents for the American left. They're all about tearing down the institutions of this country that have made it great, that defined it, made us unique, in just over 200 short years compared to thousands and thousands of years for many other countries. Tear it down, just not fair. They want to control it. They want to own it. They want to remake it their image so that -- why do you think they admire Fidel Castro and Hugo Chavez? What is there to admire about Cuba? Nothing, unless you are jealous of the power that Castro has, and jealous of the power that Chavez has. That's what it is that drives them. I'll tell you, folks, you own all by yourself the greatness of this country, and it doesn't need replacing by somebody who wishes to replicate failure and misery the world has known for too long.

RUSH: Mrs. Clinton wants to remake American society. Remember, it wasn't long ago, a few years ago in San Francisco Mrs. Clinton said, "We're going to have to take more from you to give it to the common good." Remember her husband, Bill Clinton, in Buffalo said, (Clinton impression) "I think I might give you a tax cut, but I don't trust the way you'd spend it. I think we'd spend it better than what you would." These people have been very open and bold about what their intentions are, just as enemies in Al-Qaeda have been, and yet people somehow don't have it register. So I'm going to try to take care of that. Keep this in mind. We have to take more from you to give it to the common good. We are going to have shared prosperity. Get that and keep it in mind with this next story, also AP.

"Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton said Wednesday that she followed all Senate rules when she accepted rides on a private jet from a longtime benefactor." Oh, yeah, everybody does it, no big deal, old news. "Whatever I've done, I complied with Senate rules at the time. That's the way every senator operates." The ol' "everybody does it excuse." Everybody lies about sex, whatever the Clintons do, everybody does it, and that's the excuse. "Clinton's travel, along with and consulting fees paid to her husband, the former president, have come to light recently in a lawsuit against Vinod Gupta, a Clinton contributor and chief executive of the data company, InfoUSA Inc. The lawsuit by company shareholders accuses Gupta of excessively spending millions of dollars, including $900,000 worth of travel on the Clintons." But that's not the half of it. What did this company do? It collected private data on elderly and gave it to people so they could exploit them. Gupta's company took advantage of the elderly, gave the database away, and this a firm that's flying the Clintons around on this jet and contributing $900,000 in other forms of travel.

"Sen. Clinton, who complained about corporate America's largesse and skyrocketing executive pay during campaign events Wednesday, said she did not believe her message was undermined by her acceptance of the private flights. In line with Senate rules then in effect, Clinton's campaign has said she reimbursed Gupta at the cost of a first-class flight, typically a significant discount off the expense of a private jet." You want to know the difference? The kind of plane she's traveling around on, try five, $6,000 an hour, versus a first-class ticket of 1200 bucks for her flights. It's a stark difference. I know these are Senate rules. But we need leadership here. Mrs. Clinton once again setting things up for everybody else while exempting herself. She thinks executive pay ought to be examined and that the public ought to have veto rights over executive pay. She's worried about the largesse of American corporations and is out there just playing this class envy card. She said, "'Those were the rules. You'll have to ask somebody else whether that's good policy.' Clinton struck several populist notes Wednesday in a speech at a union hall and at a town hall appearance at a North Las Vegas high school with large number of minority and low-income students. ... The senator made light of her own personal wealth."

She actually said this. You know, these people cannot stop bragging about their wealth. She said, "'I know a lot of rich people. My husband and I never had any money ... now all (of a) ... sudden we're rich,' Clinton said. 'I have nothing against rich people. ... but what made America great is the American middle class.' She won her loudest applause with her promise to end the war in Iraq." All right, so here's a woman who wants to take everything you've got above what everybody else has and give it to everybody else. Is she going to spend her own money to fly herself? Why can't you go charter jets yourself, Mrs. Clinton, you've got all this money, you're rich. We're rich. My husband and I never had any money. Now all of a sudden we're rich, as though just an accident, woke up one day, we're rich. Are they going to spend it themselves? No, they're going to use other people's money to get themselves around because they're hoarding what they have. They're into the preservation of principal mode. They're not going to spend any of their money, but boy, they're going to take yours. So she will not live her life the way she is demanding and promising that everybody else will live theirs. BREAK TRANSCRIPT

RUSH: Michael in Manhattan, Kansas, great to have you as you're up first. You know, the first caller every day sets the tone for all the other callers. It's an awesome responsibility.

CALLER: All right. Hey, I was calling about Chairman Hillary and what's going to happen to us average guys that make less than $30,000 a year out here if she gets her way in this new society she's wanting to push forward.

RUSH: Well, the danger about this is two things, really. She's actively talking about doing it, and it will be interesting to see what kind of support she gets on it, and that's actually not true because they're not making a big deal about this. This is one of these Hillary stories that's being buried. The next thing is there's an 80% chance this woman is going to be elected the next president of the United States. As we sit here today, there is an 80% chance that she's the next president. (interruption) You totally disagree with that, Snerdley? Well, no, I'm not going to give -- (interruption) Thompson is not in yet. Thompson gets in, we'll recalculate, but no. I'm not even basing it on any of the Republican candidates right now. It's a historical thing. When's the last time that, aside from George H. Bush winning the third term after Reagan's two, when's the last time parties held the White House for three terms other than FDR? You got that historical aspect, but there are other factors. I've detailed them on previous broadcasts, don't need to detail them again here. Fact is there's an 80% chance she's going to be the next president, as we sit here today.

Now, anything can change tomorrow to upset this apple cart. If she really tries to do this, you know, this is not inconsequential. Words mean things. She's been saying this stuff since she was first lady. She's been saying this is what her vision of the ideal society is. It's not enough to sit there, "Ah, it will never happen." It will if people don't shape up and pay attention and understand that she'll try. I don't know whether she can succeed in pulling it off, but the Soviets always had these five-year plans and these ten-year plans, and they never, ever admitted failure. If they took two steps forward and had to take a step back, they would do it. They didn't actually put limits or time limits on when they had to get this done or if they didn't it would be a failure. They never gave up. That's the way liberals are. That's why they have to constantly be battled; that's why they have to constantly be defeated. They don't give up. They'd love to have all this done tomorrow, Hugo Chavez would be vice president. They can't get it done tomorrow but they'll do it and take as long as they need to get it done. So it requires constant vigilance and taking this stuff seriously. Look, folks, I'm not making it up. I'm not coming here and saying, "I know this woman. I know what she's really thinking." She's telling us. It's just like what bin Laden is telling us, and Zawahiri is telling us. It's up to us to listen to this stuff. I know you are, and I'm actually talking about the American people beyond the boundaries of this program. Tip City, Ohio, this is Brenda. Brenda, glad you waited, welcome to the EIB Network.

CALLER: Hi, Rush. I hope you're having a wonderful day. Pleasure to talk to you.

RUSH: Yeah, we are. CALLER: It sent shivers town my spine to hear you talk about what Hillary wants to do because the American left, the average person that would vote for something like that, it's scary because most of the world that came into power and ran a society like she's talking about -- i.e., Cuba -- they did it through brute force. And we have enough American people that would actually vote her into office to do that, that's scary.

RUSH: Yeah, it's true. Why do you think this is? It's because the 50-year effort at exploiting class envy -- this is a great example. They don't stop, whether they lose elections, whether or not, they don't stop. They keep using class envy, resentment, tax cuts on the rich for every malady that everybody else has. And human nature is undeniable. It is what it is. A lot of people have the syndrome, the grass is always greener, keeping up with the Joneses, and it's just a fact of life and human nature that people look at others who have more and get envious and jealous, some people do, "How come they have all that, and I don't? I'm just as good as they are. It's not fair." Somebody comes along and says, "Don't worry, I'll take it away from them." "All right, I want to feel better because I want to see those people get punished." We all love the car crash. Our culture these days loves to build people up and then tear 'em down. We love it when people get torn down. We love it when people "get theirs." The left has been promulgating this kind of stuff for decades and decades, and they've been fueling this resentment.

So, yeah, you're right, there are a certain number of Americans -- my gosh, if they can cheer Hugo Chavez shutting down an opposition TV station; if they can cheer the United States losing the war on terror and losing in Iraq; if they can cheer this, you don't think they'll have an easier time cheering the rich in this country, the so-called rich getting theirs? I've had calls from people, "Yeah, I think this is a good idea. These CEOs are making way too much money. The oil companies profits, give the profits back, lower the price." They could eliminate their profit for one year and it would matter a nickel to the gallon of gas that they sell for a year. It doesn't stand up to any sort of analysis. Yet people have called here, "I think would be good. CEOs make too much money. It's not fair. Line workers aren't making anything." Let me ask you a question. Let's say that the CEO salaries get cut. By the way, they'll just find a way to bonus them with stock options or whatever. They're not going to lose money, folks. It's not going to end up happening that way. But in the meantime, let's say that your neighbor makes more than you do. He gets a tax increase and you don't, so he has less money than he had. Is your life any better? Is your economic circumstance improved at all by somebody else suffering economic hardship? It doesn't matter a hill of beans. But the people Hillary talks to and appeals to have been conditioned because they're fomenting out this hate and rage to be made happy when others share their misery. And that's what she's trying to do. BREAK TRANSCRIPT

CALLER: Thank you very much. It's a pleasure to talk to you. I've been listening to you for ten years now.

CALLER: Hm-hm. That's right. I called Senator Clinton's office in Washington yesterday, and I mentioned that I heard that she spoke about the sharing society as opposed to ownership society, and I asked, you know, she's building with her husband, they're building a new mansion in Puerto Rico, I think?

RUSH: She and her husband have either been given -- who knows with these people -- a plot of land or else they bought it, and they're building a big hideaway down there next to Oscar de la Renta.

CALLER: Uh-huh. So I asked, you know, if she believes in the sharing society, if maybe we can go on vacation in the home. I mean, share it with everyone else.

CALLER: So, anyway, so the person who answered me, she was shocked at the suggestion. She didn't really understand what I was suggesting, and I kept pressing the matter, and she said, "Well, you know, we can't really talk policy to the people who call here." So that was it.

RUSH: Can't talk policy. It's more like won't talk policy. More like, "Who the hell do you think you are, Bava, calling here, demanding that Mrs. Clinton explain herself to you? You're just a voter in Brooklyn."

CALLER: That's right. That's right, absolutely. well, that was really to be expected. So, anyway, just want to tell you again it was a pleasure to talk to you.

RUSH: Thank you, Bava, I appreciate it. Great story. "We don't talk policy to callers." That's why I say talk radio is the most democratic, wide-open forum for the exchange of ideas in the American media today. That is precisely why the left finds it fearful and problematic and wants to do a Hugo Chavez on us.

Chairman Hillary... who wants to remake America. In the socialist image.

Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." -Manuel II Paleologus

She has been an identified HARD MARXIST for a long time. This has been her obsession, her lust for socialist power and totalitarian government control.

Vote Hillary - 2008 and get a big taste of hard socialism.

We better be ready to fight again. But most are working themselves to death.....and don’t have the time, the energy, or the money to fight. And the rest are on the socialist government teat and don’t care about fighting anyway.

“We had no money!” - Hillary 1992 & 2007 !!!

1979 - Slick Willie Elected Governor of Arkansas

1979 - Hillary made Walmart Board of Directors
Got $100,000 in stock! (The day after Bill was elected!)

1979 - Hillary joined Rose Law Firm

1979 - Hillary makes $100,000 on cattle futures with help from Tyson Foods executive

one of my tv-moron neighbors

gets visibly angry when i mention rush,

in fact, she growls and shouts.

i asked her, have you ever listened to rush?

no, she said.

NEVER FORGET

HILLARY RODHAM & WILLIAM CLINTON’s supporting Communist North Vietnam’s push to take over a then Free South Vietnam during the Vietnam War =

Pictures of a vietnamese Vietnamese Re-Education (SLAVE LABOR) Camp

http://www.Freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1308949/posts

http://www.JourneyFromTheFall.com

What Price for the still Free to pay now with the Enemy Within CLINTONS back in the Oval Office ...with our own Freedom directly at stake right here at home..?

12 Million suddenly missing Iraqi purple voting fingers on our TV screens for starters..?

BET on it.

NEVER FORGET

Is their anyway the public can view Hillary's tax return's. Personally, want to know what charities she contributes to and how much she is now deducting for her used underwear that she gives to GoodWill. . .

(think if was $5 per item, when she was 'donating - and deducting' back in Arkansas - or maybe it was $25 per?)

The Aussies are the only friends we have that are worth a damn anymore. She gets in were in serious trouble..We’ll have the crap taxed out of us rightnoff the bat ..Add in a bogus global warming tax , pay for the illegals , they are setting the stage for it right now .

the imposition of Socialism is one of the reasons that the framers of our constitution included the second amendment it that great document.
If the hilderbeast wants socialism then she needs to move down with old Hugo.
Socialism being imposed on us by the beast would be the best reason I know of for an armed citizen revolt.

We fought over 200 years ago to make this country a republic, and Hitlery wants to turn it into a socialist government overnight.

I'm blaming all the morons who support her more than I even blame her. They obviously are more than happy to give her the opportunity to destroy this country. At least in the past, people were smart enough not to vote for Gus Hall, but they can't seem to get enough of Hillary Rotten Hall.

I’ve talked to some of them today actually. They think her plan is all fine and dandy. ‘We’re supposed to take care of those less fortunate’, ‘why is that so bad?” ‘It’s about equality”.

Ugh.

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.