All three of your sentences are false and/or misleading.
Actually, computerized evolutionary simulations were performed successfully and published in peer-reviewed journals a few decades ago.
> All three of your sentences are false and/or misleading.
I am a software engineer. I do this for a living, and I’ve been doing it for over 20 years.
I can promise you that you will never see “Flight Simulator” evolve into “Linux” by injecting random bits into, or taking random bits out of, the code.
There is nothing false or misleading about any of those statements.
Just because it is not congruent with your silly paridigm, does not mean that it is inherently false.
> Actually, computerized evolutionary simulations were
> performed successfully and published in peer-reviewed
> journals a few decades ago.
Yes, proving the point that no intelligence whatsoever is necessary to create life or even to drive “evolution”.
:rolleyes:
But then again, circular reasoning is the hallmark of the Evolutionist. His belief system cannot exist without it, in spite of his vigorous protestations to the contrary.