A mail to me from Laurie Mylroie : Iraq linked to 9/11, anthrax letters

My blog ^ | 05 30 2007 | drzz

[drzz]

From : Laurie Mylroie Sent : Sat, 07 26 2007 18:54:48 To : drzz Subject : Re: Thank you for your fight for truth

Thank you very much for your extremely kind note. You can be sure that Iraq was behind 9/11--and the anthrax letters that followed. The FBI has yet to explains, six years later, who was responsible for the anthrax letters!

Thanks for sending the videos. Unfortunately, I'm traveling now and don't have a very fast internet connection, but thanks again for your note.

Laurie Mylroie

[ZacandPook]

That April 2007 article study above cites another landmark study
published March 2007 titled “Stable isotope ratios of tap water in the
contiguous United States” in “Water Resources Research, Vol. 43 (pdf
available upon request). The study was funded by the “federal
government.” The raw data survey results have been embargoed “by the
federal government.” ( I believe the agency would usually be
identified). In other water isotope ratio studies the funding agency
was identified as the Central Intelligence Agency or whatever agency it
was. (It varied). Perhaps this March 2007 study was funded by the
Department of Justice/Federal Bureau of Investigation and was done
specifically for the purpose of laying the scientific groundwork of a
prosecution in Amerithrax. While the Maryland scientist in the study
was looking at the nutrients in the culture, the Utah scientist in this
study is looking at the tap water. The DOJ/FBI likely hopes to put all
the data together with the more familiar reasons to suspect someone
(means, motive, modus operandi and opportunity), and put on a case that
to a moral certainty proves it was committed by the perp(s) — where
otherwise, absent the scientific evidence, there is a lack of a
“smoking gun.” Here, based on this new science, there apparently is
thought to be a smoking petri dish.

I’ve tested many dozens of water samples from around the Northeastern
US for unrelated public health purposes, and I certainly accept that
there are real differences that can be duplicated through scientific
methods. For example, last year, I got most stores throughout the
Northeast United States to recall their contaminated store-brand water
(the name varied with the chain) by having Wegmans duplicate my results
showing it was contaminated. The supplier (a Northeastern US spring)
was disputing my results, saying that their testing showed no problem.
Wegmans, demonstrating how a responsible corporation acts,
independently had the water tested and confirmed my findings, taking
their samples at random from among their 71 stores. (I had an
entirely different experience with Coke’s Mexican distributor in
connection with testing for arsenic).

The March 2007 isotope ratio study explains: “Here we present results
from the first national-scale spatiotemporal survey of stable isotopes
in tap water. The new data show that tap water samples exhibit high
levels of spatially coherent isotope ratio variation that can be
related to commonality in patterns of water source and
postprecipitation history for water resources in different parts of
the country. A strong relationship exists between tap water isotope
ratios and those of annually averaged local precipitation (as estimated
by geostatistical modeling), but robust differences between tap water
and precipitation isotope ratios also exist in many parts of the United
States. These patterns can be related to regional tendencies in water
resource selection and water history, including patterns likely related
to high-altitude dominated sources, seasonally based recharge, and
evaporative loss from natural or artificial surface reservoirs. Our
data provide the first evidence that large, spatially distributed
isotope sample networks offer the potential to identify and
characterize the magnitude and regional relevance of such processes
within complex human-hydrological systems. ... We synthesize our data
as a set of predictive tap water isotope ratio maps that, when
interpreted with respect for the limitations of the underlying data,
should benefit future water resources research efforts as well as
fields such as ecology and forensic sciences where understanding of
large-scale patterns of hydrological isotope ratio variation is
increasingly important.

I am not scientifically trained, but my understanding is that by
looking at the Oxygen, Hydrogen and Deuterium geospatial distribution,
you can achieve more precise geospatial location of where the water
came from. So for example, the deuterium map might be relied upon to
eliminate an ambiguity left by the light blue/light green range of the”
oxygen and hydrogen maps.

Bottom-line: there’s no reason yet to doubt the NBC report that the isotope ratios point to growth of the culture in the Northeastern United States. My lay reading of the maps and various studies, however, suggests that it was not grown in New Jersey, Ohio or Maryland.