Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Americans still split on doctor-assisted suicide
AP via MSNBC.com ^ | May 29, 2007 | Unattributed

Posted on 05/29/2007 6:58:01 PM PDT by gpapa

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-40 last
To: gas_dr

But many doctors would and do. My father, after living with lymphoma for 19 years, gradually lost control of every bodily function. At the end he could no longer see (the tumors had distended his eyelids and they wouldn’t close), talk (he could make noises but did not have speech) or swallow. I spoke to him by phone shortly before he passed away. That night my mother realized he needed the morphine that the VA doctors had recommended and signed the authorization. He died shortly after the morphine was given. I suspect they OD’d him but absolutely do not want to know for sure. All I could think about was that his suffering had ended. Neither I nor anyone in my family could have helped him end his life and he would never have asked that of us. I suspect you are wrong about the AMERICAN PUBLIC. Most of us could never participate in the ending of a life.

So, I paraphrased the Oath but it does say, in a variety of ways, to do no harm. Why have so many doctors gone astray? And whatever you think about the polls on this, polls are nothing but media manipulation to get the results the media wants. The media and left-wing journalists are for euthanasia. The people who thought Michael Schaivo was right to do what he did were thinking about themselves. Nobody has ever answered my question, when did Terri articulate her desire to die? Because the last time I looked, her husband was getting over a million dollars because he convinced a judge that she wanted to live.

Rant done. Good night.


21 posted on 05/29/2007 10:23:06 PM PDT by originalbuckeye (I want a hero....I'm holding out for a hero (politically))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: gas_dr

But many doctors would and do. My father, after living with lymphoma for 19 years, gradually lost control of every bodily function. At the end he could no longer see (the tumors had distended his eyelids and they wouldn’t close), talk (he could make noises but did not have speech) or swallow. I spoke to him by phone shortly before he passed away. That night my mother realized he needed the morphine that the VA doctors had recommended and signed the authorization. He died shortly after the morphine was given. I suspect they OD’d him but absolutely do not want to know for sure. All I could think about was that his suffering had ended. Neither I nor anyone in my family could have helped him end his life and he would never have asked that of us. I suspect you are wrong about the AMERICAN PUBLIC. Most of us could never participate in the ending of a life.

So, I paraphrased the Oath but it does say, in a variety of ways, to do no harm. Why have so many doctors gone astray? And whatever you think about the polls on this, polls are nothing but media manipulation to get the results the media wants. The media and left-wing journalists are for euthanasia. The people who thought Michael Schaivo was right to do what he did were thinking about themselves. Nobody has ever answered my question, when did Terri articulate her desire to die? Because the last time I looked, her husband was getting over a million dollars because he convinced a judge that she wanted to live.

Rant done. Good night.


22 posted on 05/29/2007 10:23:36 PM PDT by originalbuckeye (I want a hero....I'm holding out for a hero (politically))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: gpapa

It is not the duty of doctors and nurses to end the lives of their patients. It is their duty to preserve the lives of their patients. It is immoral to kill another person or help another person commit suicide. Now it is understandable if they tell the doctors to deny extraodinary means or efforts, or if the need to be comfortable requires medication that may hasten death.

I agree with one poster that remarked suffering has a place in human life. If one is Christian, one is taught to unite one’s suffering with Christ’s suffering on the cross. Suffering is a part of humanity that can bring us closer to Christ. Some people believe that suffering makes one undignified, but all humans suffer. No human has a perfect life, some just suffer more than others. To say that suffering takes away dignity, takes away the dignity of every person on Earth.


23 posted on 05/30/2007 12:52:41 AM PDT by Pinkbell (Hunter/Thompson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gondring

If your lone obsession is to die, maybe.

A more farsighted person would choose a physician who could tell the difference between a depressed brain talking and a patient talking.


24 posted on 05/30/2007 1:02:13 AM PDT by HiTech RedNeck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: gpapa; Abram; akatel; albertp; AlexandriaDuke; Alexander Rubin; Allosaurs_r_us; amchugh; ...






Libertarian ping! To be added or removed from my ping list freepmail me or post a message here.
25 posted on 05/30/2007 6:50:47 AM PDT by traviskicks (http://www.neoperspectives.com/Ron_Paul_2008.htm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gpapa

What do they mean Doctor assisted suicide? Don’t they mean executioner assisted suicide?


26 posted on 05/30/2007 6:52:41 AM PDT by BuffaloJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ThisLittleLightofMine
Suffering has purpose is this life. Cancer is terrible but we are not little gods.

Wow - just wow. Have you ever seen anyone dying of cancer and in intense pain? They have wasted away from the "treatments" and once strong men now weigh 100lbs and every moment of their life is agony.

You really think that giving a patient like this a little extra morphine to end the suffering is playing god?

This "I'm a christian soldier" crap has to end.

27 posted on 05/30/2007 9:33:02 AM PDT by JeffAtlanta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Pinkbell
To say that suffering takes away dignity, takes away the dignity of every person on Earth.

Yet cancer patients in hospice who have wasted away feel very uncomfortable with visitors and don't want people to see them in that state.

If suffering is such an honor, then shouldn't they want everyone to see them?

Just curious, according to your sect, if a person is diagnosed with cancer but chooses not to undergo treatment, are they committing suicide?

28 posted on 05/30/2007 9:37:23 AM PDT by JeffAtlanta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: gpapa

Every time I read the term “doctor-assisted suicide” the first thing that pops into my head is that a doctor must be pretty incompetent if he needs help killing himself.


29 posted on 05/30/2007 9:50:41 AM PDT by Old Professer (The critic writes with rapier pen, dips it twice, and writes again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JeffAtlanta
Wow....actually I have. I work with elderly. I am nursing student. I’ve seen people die. My husband has had cancer.
My grandmother died from pancreatic cancer and I’ve known many families that have had much suffering.

If you give a drug to end someones life prematurely....that is murder. No matter how you justify it. Christian soldier?? I am believer and so my foundation is rooted firmly in God's WORD. When someone is ill.....are they in their right state of mind....are they really able to make educated, well informed choices? What really has to end is this concept of "choice". This is a slippery slope. There is no difference between aborting a baby and killing a sick person.

30 posted on 05/30/2007 10:31:57 AM PDT by ThisLittleLightofMine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Ken H

Hey if someone wants to take a gun to themselves or OD that is their choice but I do not want state sanctioned assisted suicide laws.

I have to ask how assisted suicide differs from abortion?


31 posted on 05/30/2007 10:36:43 AM PDT by ThisLittleLightofMine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: JeffAtlanta

Well, I’m sure they don’t want people to see them because it is natural for people to only want people to see them when they look their best. A lot of women don’t even want people to see them without their make up on and hair done. People with cancer may feel embarrased because they aren’t “fixed up” so to speak, they look ill, and they may have lost a lot of weight. Really, it’s easier said than done, but a person should not feel ashamed for not looking well when they are ill.

If a person has cancer and decides that he/she would not like chemo, radiation, or some other forum of treatment, that is not suicide. That person just didn’t feel treatment would help or be of benefit to them. If a person is in a lot of pain and needs a good deal of morphine, that may hasten death, but it in itself is not assisted suicide.

There are some denials of treatments that could be considered suicide and immoral. For example, if a generally healthy person with diabetes gets depressed one day and stops taking insulin to die, that would be considered suicide.

What we are opposed to, though, is direct medication through asssited suicide or euthanasia to end a person’s life prematurely.


32 posted on 05/30/2007 12:31:04 PM PDT by Pinkbell (Hunter/Thompson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: madprof98

My exit strategy is to take out a few MADD mothers (of either sex), then as many nicotine, seatbelt and food Nazis as I have ammunition for, then challenge some sort of SWAT team to a shootout.


33 posted on 05/30/2007 6:57:03 PM PDT by elkfersupper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Coleus; AdmSmith; Berosus; Convert from ECUSA; dervish; Ernest_at_the_Beach; Fred Nerks; ...
Ping!

34 posted on 06/09/2007 7:29:28 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (Time heals all wounds, particularly when they're not yours. Profile updated June 8, 2007.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gpapa; 2ndMostConservativeBrdMember; afraidfortherepublic; Alas; al_c; american colleen; annalex; ..

.


35 posted on 06/09/2007 7:43:12 PM PDT by Coleus (Woe unto him that call evil good and good evil"-- Isaiah 5:20-21)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 8mmMauser; T'wit

Ping...


36 posted on 06/10/2007 1:47:17 AM PDT by TheSarce ("America is NOT what's wrong with this world." --Donald Rumsfeld)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah
>> "Would you feel secure seeking medical advice or treatment from a doctor known to have killed many of his patients"?

Funny, I haven't heard any poll figures for THAT question :-) It does put things into perspective. Why do let them practice medicine if they use medicine to kill? Why do we even call them doctors if they turn into murderers?

37 posted on 06/10/2007 2:41:30 AM PDT by T'wit (Visitors: you come here expecting a turkey shoot, and then you find out that you are the turkey.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Ken H
So, Ken H, you wanna' try it out on yourself first then leave it up to us to judge if you were correct?

Hmmmm.

38 posted on 06/10/2007 5:45:28 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Diana in Wisconsin
And the difference, when it is boiled down to the bare bones, (putting aside animal is not human, morals,ethics, religion) the truth of the matter is: you have nothing to gain from the death of your dog BUT may have something to gain from the death of a “loved” one. People have agendas and often their agendas are motivated by greed (a very powerful motivator)...as in Schaivo.
39 posted on 06/10/2007 7:08:02 AM PDT by socialismisinsidious ( The socialist income tax system turns US citizens into beggars or quitters!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: JeffAtlanta
And what of the slippery slope? The one that says it's OK to kill terminally ill cancer patients, then "suffering" MS/ALS patients, then severely handicapped babies (they will have rotten lives after all), then handicapped babies (who wants to be burdened with a Downs baby?), then the elderly (they are at the end of their lives anyway).......where does it end? Who gets to draw the line and set the definitions of "terminal" or "handicapped"

Don't believe the line will be moved, that definitions will blur...study history.
40 posted on 06/10/2007 7:17:10 AM PDT by socialismisinsidious ( The socialist income tax system turns US citizens into beggars or quitters!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-40 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson