[colorado tanker]

This is more double-talk from Mr. crooked-arrow Fitz. Plame had a cover involving some phony energy consultancy she used to go to conferences and some meetings. That's common in the CIA and it is not the same thing as being a covert agent, which is why Armitage wasn't charged. She didn't meet the statutory definition.

Why is this suddenly relevant when Fitz claimed through the trial it wasn't? Because she couldn't continue in her CIA position? Who's fault is that? Armitage and the CIA officer who confirmed her employment and did not claim she was covert in talking to Novak, that's who. Or 007 Plame herself, who involved herself and her husband in a CIA hit on the Bush administration by running this operation to Niger, having "Ambassador" Joe write his NYT hit piece and sign on as a Kerry adviser. Look in the mirror, babe.

[PghBaldy]

It’s to show the judge during sentencing that Libby was guilty of a crime which wasn’t charged or proven, yet should be used as evidence toward a harsher sentence. Fitz should be tossed out. He is a disgrace, akin to Nifong.