To: js1138
"You keep bringing this up as if we are descended from modern fish. The last time I looked at schematic tree of life, current fish were listed as cousins, not ancestors." A red herring complaint. Evolutionists claim that Fish came before Man in lineage. Your diversion is that "modern" Fish didn't spawn little men, but that's not germane. Ancient or modern implies that you have proof of some important genetic distinction that is relevant to the above point that all known Fish are missing important immune genes that ancient coral and modern Man both posses to this day.
Yet you have no such genetic evidence regarding ancient or modern Fish (even though you keep reeling both up).
22 posted on
05/29/2007 10:15:40 PM PDT by
Southack
(Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
To: Southack
Evolutionists claim that Fish came before Man in lineage. Dear child. I know you are clever enough to understand the difference between a cousin and an ancestor.
23 posted on
05/29/2007 10:30:44 PM PDT by
js1138
(The absolute seriousness of someone who is terminally deluded.)
To: Southack
Is there some rule that genetic material may only be added, not deleted?
26 posted on
05/30/2007 6:53:17 AM PDT by
ahayes
("Impenetrability! That's what I say!")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson