[Of course, mainstream science won all these challenges, and the voters in Kansas and Pennsylvania reinforced court decisions.]
A miscarriage of justice based on the bised opinions of others is no victory- The link I provided layed out many many instances which were simply overlooked and not explained whjich should have been explained- the fact is that when it looked like the case was going to actually be looked at objectively, the bias trumped objectivity as was MORE than clear in the Dover Trial as well. It’s obviously your opinion that the tiral was ‘fair and balanced’ but the eivdnece shows otherwise. You’re welcoem to your opinion- but the evidence that shows otherwise is freely available for all to see. The critical key points were glossed over and brushed aside, and the dogma of the evolution religion won out through strong arm tactics that demanded precision from the ID crowd while brushing aside and ignoring the same precision required from the evo side. Those points listed in the link provided were no small matter points, yet incredibly, they were simply ignored- Victory? Yeah, sure, if you concider injustice a victory
The voters affirmed the decision and threw the biased school board members out.
What I can’t understand is why they (the school board) put up as their #1 expert and witness a person that believes in evolution and believes that we should teach that the ID’r is most probably dead?
Specifics, please.
Actually, it is. Particularly when it is consistent in case after case, and when the voters throw the losers out.