Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: sirchtruth
The possibility exist that information is introduced from an external source which directs the activity. Why can't that be admitted by some supposed scientist?

What would be the motive for such an assumption?

It suggests that further research is unnecessary and futile.

The assumption or invisible entities twiddling with things could have been invoked at any time and any place in science, bringing curiosity and research to a halt.

391 posted on 06/04/2007 7:29:55 AM PDT by js1138 (The absolute seriousness of someone who is terminally deluded.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 372 | View Replies ]


To: js1138
It suggests that further research is unnecessary and futile.

On the contrary!!! It should suggest even more aggressive research be done, since there is no CLEAR fact as to what directs the action of the cells!

The assumption or invisible entities twiddling with things could have been invoked at any time and any place in science, bringing curiosity and research to a halt.

...I'm not sure I follow but let me interject it would be tragic if research came to a halt since we don't have a clear observable answer. All we have now is speculation, conjecture, and theory. I don't have the answer and neither does science yet, but I'm all 100% behind science to research to find these answers.

415 posted on 06/04/2007 3:18:39 PM PDT by sirchtruth (No one has the RIGHT not to be offended...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 391 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson