Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: js1138
It suggests that further research is unnecessary and futile.

On the contrary!!! It should suggest even more aggressive research be done, since there is no CLEAR fact as to what directs the action of the cells!

The assumption or invisible entities twiddling with things could have been invoked at any time and any place in science, bringing curiosity and research to a halt.

...I'm not sure I follow but let me interject it would be tragic if research came to a halt since we don't have a clear observable answer. All we have now is speculation, conjecture, and theory. I don't have the answer and neither does science yet, but I'm all 100% behind science to research to find these answers.

415 posted on 06/04/2007 3:18:39 PM PDT by sirchtruth (No one has the RIGHT not to be offended...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 391 | View Replies ]


To: sirchtruth
The lecture I recommended to you in #387, above:

"For Making Genetic Networks Operate Robustly, Unintelligent Non-design Suffices," by Garrett Odell. It is a program on the Science Forum of the Research Channel (Dish Network Channel 9400). The original lecture was 2006, at the University of Washington.

is online here.
419 posted on 06/04/2007 5:51:09 PM PDT by Coyoteman (Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 415 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson