See your #319. Pot calling the kettle black?
youl ost me- how does that have anythign to do with the fact that I have to keep repeating that personal opinions do NOT render the mechanics involved invalid when certain posters keep posting the same lame accusations time and time again?
Look- the deeper we look at a molecualr biological level, we discover the more intricate and interlaced the design is. Evo folks beleive, despite evidence to back it up, that this intricacy and complexity comes from a non directional, non thinking process of mistakes. ID believes that it is nearly mathematically impossible for the multitude of complexities we see today, that show irreducible compexities, and which show species specific uniqueness, could come from a directionless, non thinking process devoid of a director of some sort. The evo side will eventually have to show how these intricate systems could have formed, and be able to explainj much better how it is possible because it is becoming quite clear through scientific research, that design is a fact and that it is indicitive of some force that quite possibly has an intelligent quality.
Repeated accusations about someone being anti-science simply because they hold to a PERSONAL belief based on evidences they think quite validly counter what is conventionally thought, isn’t a scientific way to discredit someone- it’s simply nothjing more than a biased personal opinion about the other, that does nothign to show just how the person conducts ‘anti-science’- The results of ID scientific investigation stand on their own merrits, and although many biased people will malign peoplel ike Behe, His investigations and ponderings are infact valid enough to withstand the petty personal insults hurled his way. While Behe doesn’t believe in creation, He does believe in intelligent design, and his work has been an important venue for the further investigation of what we are beginning to see as a fact- that design exists- that it is intricate, that it resists being tampered with beyond certain caps, that it is more interconnected with a lot of other intricate designs within species, and that the breakdown of some highly specific complexities within a species would render the species unable to exist.
This is all facinating stuff, but apparently, some think that because some people within the ID realm hold certain personal beliefs, that this makes all investigations into the design present at the molecular biological level invalid. That’s just, I’m sorry to say, an assinine, personally biased and biased motivated opinion that blinds a person to the TRUE sciences that seek a completely objective truth.