Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Academia's Assault on Intelligent Design
Townhall ^ | May 27,2007 | Ken Connor

Posted on 05/28/2007 5:44:20 PM PDT by SirLinksalot

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 481-497 next last

1 posted on 05/28/2007 5:44:22 PM PDT by SirLinksalot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SirLinksalot

“What’s wrong with Dr. Gonzalez? So far as anyone can tell, this rejection had little to do with his scientific research, and everything to do with the fact that Dr. Gonzalez believes the scientific evidence points to the idea of an intelligent designer.”

And it scares the heck out of the those that hope like heck there ain’t no God.


2 posted on 05/28/2007 5:46:07 PM PDT by txzman (Jer 23:29)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SirLinksalot

For those who want to look at Prof. Guillermo Gonzalez’s Scientific qualifications, see here for his citation record among peer reviewed journals and other magazines :

http://www.calvin.edu/archive/asa/200705/0761.html


3 posted on 05/28/2007 5:47:50 PM PDT by SirLinksalot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: txzman
...the scientific evidence points to the idea of an intelligent designer.

That's the crux of the professor's problem: There isn't any scientific evidence supportive of ID.

4 posted on 05/28/2007 5:49:22 PM PDT by Rudder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SirLinksalot

Never challenge a well-established orthodoxy that is not sure of its ground. If Galileo were alive he would be on the side of Dr. Gonzalez, because he shared his views.


5 posted on 05/28/2007 5:51:02 PM PDT by RobbyS ( CHIRHO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Rudder

There could be more than one intelligent designer.


6 posted on 05/28/2007 5:53:22 PM PDT by pleikumud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Rudder
Forget the Darwinian controversy. Gonzalez is an astronomer, and his sin is not accept the many-world theory, which is founded on no empirical data.
7 posted on 05/28/2007 5:54:24 PM PDT by RobbyS ( CHIRHO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Rudder
“That’s the crux of the professor’s problem: There isn’t any scientific evidence supportive of ID.”

To state for the 98th time, Prof Gonzalez was not teaching ID in the classroom.
Not to be rude, but you may want to read on the facts of the case before commenting.
Gonzalez is being persecuted for his beliefs; mainly by a atheist “religious studies” studies professor named Hector Avalos.

8 posted on 05/28/2007 5:54:54 PM PDT by HereInTheHeartland (Never bring a knife to a gun fight, or a Democrat to do serious work...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: pleikumud

Occam’s razor. No.


9 posted on 05/28/2007 5:55:36 PM PDT by RobbyS ( CHIRHO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: SirLinksalot

>>“What’s wrong with Dr. Gonzalez? So far as anyone can tell, this rejection had little to do with his scientific research, and everything to do with the fact that Dr. Gonzalez believes the scientific evidence points to the idea of an intelligent designer.”<<

I’ve read a lot about this and I don’t think that is true.

His beliefs and credentials don’t seem to be in question. It is his position as a senior fellow in a group that works against science education. No science based department is going to want that association.

Now, we can discuss whether science related activities outside the classroom should be considered for tenure but if such activities can be considered, his are really big red flag.


10 posted on 05/28/2007 5:58:06 PM PDT by gondramB (No man can be brave who thinks pain the greatest evil)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rudder
That's the crux of the professor's problem: There isn't any scientific evidence supportive of ID.

What about the digital design of DNA? What about ORDER in general?

11 posted on 05/28/2007 5:58:27 PM PDT by sirchtruth (No one has the RIGHT not to be offended...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: txzman

This is the problem I have with Intelligent Design as science.

I believe in God and that Jesus Christ is the son and the way to the father, however, any assertions that of a Supreme Being created the universe must backed up with scientific fact. It is not, it is religion not science.


12 posted on 05/28/2007 6:02:25 PM PDT by Perdogg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SirLinksalot
I read The Privileged Planet - a great work and backed up in every way possible.

I expect the Evolution Worshippers to show up on this thread anytime now.....

10

9

8

7

6

...........

13 posted on 05/28/2007 6:02:27 PM PDT by SkyPilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RobbyS
If Galileo were alive he would be on the side of Dr. Gonzalez, because he shared his views.

Galileo would be denied tenure also.

14 posted on 05/28/2007 6:02:42 PM PDT by BipolarBob (Yes I backed over the vampire, but I swear I didn't see it in my rear view mirror.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: BipolarBob

Well, in effect, he was.


15 posted on 05/28/2007 6:03:53 PM PDT by RobbyS ( CHIRHO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: SirLinksalot

Well, let’s say for the sake of the argument that he is wrong.

A lot of scientists propose theories that turn out to be wrong. As long as they don’t fake or fudge their evidence, what’s so bad about that? If he can be proved wrong, then presumably it weakens the case for ID and indirectly helps to advance the science of astromy by eliminating one possible theory.

What is simply intolerable in this and similar cases is that he is being kicked out of his job like a criminal for proposing a politically incorrect thesis. That isn’t the way science is supposed to work. Various people propose various theories, and the better theories work their way to the top and the others are discarded. Or, alternatively, the book is simply ignored.

There is a kind of hysterical bigotry and intolerance on the part of the anti-ID people that is truly frightening, because it suggests that our scientific establishment has really gone onto ideological steroids and is unwilling to adhere to the normal rules of scientific discourse. Instead they turn to bullying, persecution, and activist judges to enforce their beliefs, and will tolerate no questions whatever of their views.


16 posted on 05/28/2007 6:04:25 PM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SirLinksalot
I’m guessing Iowa St. gets Fed funds.

is no tenure because of of beliefs a litmus tests ?

Could this go to the SCOTUS ?

17 posted on 05/28/2007 6:04:52 PM PDT by stylin19a (It's easier to get up at 6:00 AM to play golf than at 10:00 to mow the yard)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HereInTheHeartland
Gonzalez is being persecuted for his beliefs; mainly by a atheist “religious studies” studies professor named Hector Avalos.

< sarcasm > That cannot be true - people who claim to follow science are always totally objective and never let their personal fears or bias enter into the argument. < / sarcasm >

18 posted on 05/28/2007 6:05:23 PM PDT by SkyPilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: SirLinksalot

Long story short, Gonzales is just another target and victim of the Godless left. We will see much more of this as the left continues its war on the core substance and beliefs of America.


19 posted on 05/28/2007 6:06:28 PM PDT by EagleUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot

Evolution worshipers? That’s projection. Believers in ID are the worshipers trying to insert religion into science.


20 posted on 05/28/2007 6:06:32 PM PDT by saganite (Billions and billions and billions----and that's just the NASA budget!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 481-497 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson