To: SirLinksalot
“What’s wrong with Dr. Gonzalez? So far as anyone can tell, this rejection had little to do with his scientific research, and everything to do with the fact that Dr. Gonzalez believes the scientific evidence points to the idea of an intelligent designer.”
And it scares the heck out of the those that hope like heck there ain’t no God.
2 posted on
05/28/2007 5:46:07 PM PDT by
txzman
(Jer 23:29)
To: txzman
...the scientific evidence points to the idea of an intelligent designer.That's the crux of the professor's problem: There isn't any scientific evidence supportive of ID.
4 posted on
05/28/2007 5:49:22 PM PDT by
Rudder
To: txzman
This is the problem I have with Intelligent Design as science.
I believe in God and that Jesus Christ is the son and the way to the father, however, any assertions that of a Supreme Being created the universe must backed up with scientific fact. It is not, it is religion not science.
12 posted on
05/28/2007 6:02:25 PM PDT by
Perdogg
To: txzman
The opposite of intelligent design is stupid design.
70 posted on
05/28/2007 7:45:42 PM PDT by
reg45
To: txzman
Just finished reading The Privileged Planet. Dr Gonzalez it seemed wrote the astronomy parts and co-author Jay Richards wrote the philosophy parts. The astronomy parts were facts beyond dispute while the philosophy parts offered questions about design. It was a very good book, very well presented and researched. Its disgusting that this stuff happens in America. I have nothing but contempt for the fascist evos and fellow leftists.
205 posted on
05/30/2007 3:01:24 PM PDT by
razzle
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson