I haven't figured out whether that should call for a party or a hanging! Why not both?
Really...I can't in good conscience say "I know" he is responsible for the condition she suffered. I'd like to hear from the Schindlers that he did everything possible to rehabilite her in the earlier years. Maybe he did, but at some point, it appears to me that he was a lying, evil person, one who "killed" his conscience...who knows when. I don't expect a confession.
Who can? Only two people knew for certain. One of them had the other put to death. He may have thought that dead wives tell no tales, but time and medical science will show that he was wrong about that.
We look at it first from the other side. We ask for an INNOCENT explanation of Terri's injuries. The only one that Michael's supporters can offer is, "It's just one of those things that medical science cannot explain." There actually are a few cases of young women dying of cardiac arrest for no known reason, but the odds are astronomical against it. And that's without even considering the context: Michael and Terri were having a big fight.
Michael's only alibi, and it was absurd all along, was shot down in the autopsy report. So this is a false direction. There simply is no basis for supposing that Terri's injuries were innocent or from some natural cause.
That leaves domestic violence as the only answer. And sad to say, there is nothing rare or unusual about domestic violence. It is the #1 cause of death and injury to young women -- more even than automobile wrecks.
Logically, then, the question isn't whether Michael hurt Terri, but how. The problem at hand is finding a means of injuring her that is consistent with Terri's medical history.