I have not read any of the testimony about this. As I repeatedly said, I'm interested in the medicine. However, I find the GAL report a good source of impartial information. If the testimony is as you say it is, he didn't find it persuasive:
Of Michael Schiavo, there is the incorrect perception that he has refused to relinquish his guardianship because of financial interests, and more recently, because of allegations that he actually abused Theresa and seeks to hide this. There is no evidence in the record to substantiate any of these perceptions or allegations.
You just read some, sir, from Jackie Rhoades. Mr. Wolfson doesn't consider hostile testimony to be part of the record. There was a lot of it.
Btw, you are only interested in the medicine. Wolfson has nothing to do with that. He was a poll parrot for the Greer court.