[TChad]

Well, her lies have caused the deaths of many many people.

Just like Hitler did at Auschwitz and Buchenwald, right?

It is worthwhile to discuss methods to increase indoor spraying of DDT in Africa.

It is not worth worthwhile to listen to comparisons of Rachel Carson and Hitler.

Hitler intended to kill as many Jews as possible. Rachel Carson did not intend to kill a single African. Can you see any difference between them now?

Why the hell am I wasting my time here? Good night.

[calljack]

liberal alert
intentions are more important than results.
Hitler intended...
Rachel Carson did not intend...

Yes, but what actually happened???

[Publius6961]

Hitler intended to kill as many Jews as possible. Rachel Carson did not intend to kill a single African. Can you see any difference between them now?

Well, no I don't.
I'm sorry you left.

Are you suggesting that Rachel was so monumentally stupid, ignorant and incompetent as to not know how many people died of malaria before she published her book?

If you believe that, the statement still holds, prefaced by the phrase, "Rachel Carson was so monumentally stupid that..."

[Rembrandt]

“Why the hell am I wasting my time here? Good night.”
—
On this, Hanging Chad, I agree wholeheartedly. Good night and good riddance.

See yaaaah

[sionnsar]

Why the hell am I wasting my time here? Good night.

I for one do not think your time here tonight was wasted. Not one bit.

[D Rider]

Hitler intended to kill as many Jews as possible. Rachel Carson did not intend to kill a single African. Can you see any difference between them now?

I guess that you miss the point. The point is that her erroneous ideas resulted the the deaths of hundreds of millions, while Hitlers intentional slaughter was only able to kill tens of millions. Do you get the point of this type of comparison now?