Well, no I don't.
I'm sorry you left.
Are you suggesting that Rachel was so monumentally stupid, ignorant and incompetent as to not know how many people died of malaria before she published her book?
If you believe that, the statement still holds, prefaced by the phrase, "Rachel Carson was so monumentally stupid that..."
I agree, I don't see much difference. Those who reacted to her book and flawed research undertook actions that killed untold tens of millions of innocent humans. That is evil. The very simple fact that few in the MSM, would bluntly repudiate her says a lot. She is still looked on as good because of her intentions.
It would be proper and just for leaders of the world to bluntly state, "Carson's book and research resulted in tens of millions of humans being killed for NO reason. She has been repudiated by facts and deserves no respect." Instead, we have PC leaders and evil leftists worshiping her still; disgusting. Imagine the 10's of millions of innocents in the third world in Africa if the likes of non-scientist Gore has his way with the biggest fraud in world history, AGW. Real science is being totally corrupted by the anti-capitalist and anti-human left. Environmental extremists, if they had their way, would make Hitler look like an amateur. Without strong leadership to fight them, the likes of Gore will continue to be hell bent of destroying our way of life, and purposely kill millions of innocents in the third world. That is evil.