To: DaveLoneRanger
"Most Americans believe in the Bible, which teaches that land animals were created along with Adam and Eve."
But I really can't recall even the slightest inference of any T-Rex's running about, munching on apples, playing catch, etc. Am I wrong?
Did the dinosaurs and mammals get along on Noah's ark or did they have to be separated?
29 posted on
05/26/2007 5:46:04 PM PDT by
Nova
To: Nova
They stayed behind to frolic with the Unicorns. Don’t you know nothing?
To: Nova
The Book of Job speaks of the “behemoth” with “a tail like a cedar.” Sounds vaguely familiar.
36 posted on
05/26/2007 5:53:04 PM PDT by
LiteKeeper
(Beware the secularization of America; the Islamization of Eurabia)
To: Nova
The same people who planted dinosaur bones destroyed the WTC. Seek the truth!!!
heh
37 posted on
05/26/2007 5:54:11 PM PDT by
Bogey78O
(Don't call them jihadis. Call them irhabis. Tick them off, don't entertain their delusion.)
To: Nova
Did the dinosaurs and mammals get along on Noah's ark or did they have to be separated?
Q. What's harder than getting a pregnant Brontosaurus into the ark?A. Getting a Brontosaurus pregnant in the ark!
(Noah! Make them stop. I'm getting seasick!)
38 posted on
05/26/2007 5:56:20 PM PDT by
Coyoteman
(Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge.)
To: Nova
"Did the dinosaurs and mammals get along on Noah's ark or did they have to be separated?"
My guess is they were all infants so it wasn't a big deal.
42 posted on
05/26/2007 6:00:53 PM PDT by
joebuck
To: Nova
Dinosaurs became extinct long before Noah’s Ark.
However, all animals, birds, insects etc. that lived in the Garden of Eden lived in harmony until Adam and Eve disobeyed God and ate of the forbidden fruit.
That is my humble opinion.
To: Nova
Dinosaur is a new word of about 175 years or so. Dragon is one word refered in the Bible to large animals.
In Job: 40
"15": Behold now behemoth, which I made with thee; he eateth grass as an ox.
"16": Lo now, his strength is in his loins, and his force is in the navel of his belly.
"17": He moveth his tail like a cedar: the sinews of his stones are wrapped together.
"18": His bones are as strong pieces of brass; his bones are like bars of iron.
You can interpret any way you wish but please explain what know living animal has a tail as large as a ceder tree, let alone the rest of the statement.
If you read further in the same chapter you will see reference to the beast drinking up the river Jordan, sounds like a large animal to me.
Now this was after the global flood of Noah's day. It is speculation on many that if the animals were baby's at the time of the flood they would eat less, sleep longer during their 1 year stay on the ark. This would allow for more animals kinds, which would repopulate the earth with different varieties as populations became isolated as ice melted and continent masses became defined.
Also having young animals would allow them to live longer after the flood to propagate more.
238 posted on
05/28/2007 8:11:42 PM PDT by
Creationist
( Evolution=alternative to believing in God to justify their moral shortfalls and animal behavior)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson