[fortheDeclaration]

Popper definition of science was wrong.

It is just neo-Kantian nonsense.

Science is about find out the truth using a certain methodology, experimentation and observation.

None of this methods are of any use in understanding the origins of the Universe and life.

Ultimately, Evolution is a faith based system, interpreting the data according to a naturalistic world view.

Popper did state that Evolution was not a legitimate science, but then recanted it under pressure.

[ColdWater]

Popper did state that Evolution was not a legitimate science, but then recanted it under pressure after learning the scientific bases for evolution.

Now, why doesn't AiG present these facts? Biased? Willing to let the ignorant read their info and spread it on other websites?

[ColdWater]

None of this methods are of any use in understanding the origins of the Universe and life.

Right. The bible gives us all we need to know ... "In the beginning God created ... Sorry, I and many others want to know more.

[ColdWater]

Science is about find out the truth using a certain methodology, experimentation and observation. None of this methods are of any use in understanding the origins of the Universe and life.

We have learned much about the origins of the universe and life in the last 100 years using these methods.

[ColdWater]

Science is about find out the truth using a certain methodology, experimentation and observation. None of this methods are of any use in understanding the origins of the Universe and life.

A hundred years ago YEC'rs were insisting that the sun didn't have enough mass to burn for more than a few thousand years. Now we know that the sun has enough mass to 'burn' for billions of years. YEC'rs arguments fall to science all the time. Or do you still believe that the sun will only last a few thousand years?