Skip to comments.
Creation Museum Marries Adam, Eve and Dinosaurs
ABC News ^
| May 25, 2007
| Staff
Posted on 05/26/2007 9:24:34 AM PDT by Sleeping Beauty
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220, 221-240, 241-260 ... 341-359 next last
To: Coyoteman
The argument you are repeating is that radiocarbon dating only is accurate up to 3,500 years because the global flood throws things off earlier than that date. That might be accurate if there was any scientific evidence of a global flood. There is not. We have as much real evidence for a global Flood as we do for Evolution!
221
posted on
05/31/2007 5:40:42 AM PDT
by
fortheDeclaration
(We must beat the Democrats or the country will be ruined! -Abe Lincoln)
To: Sleeping Beauty
Creation Museum Marries Adam, Eve and Dinosaurs At least they should have the right to marry.
222
posted on
05/31/2007 5:42:27 AM PDT
by
Aquinasfan
(When you find "Sola Scriptura" in the Bible, let me know)
To: ColdWater
Thus, radiocarbon dating is only accurate up to 3,500 years. You have already admitted that you were ignorant on the technicalities of radiocarbon dating so you should not make such sweeping, false statements. I know enough about it to know that it is a fact that the evolutionists have to assume that the dates on the RadioCarbon dating are not being affected by changes that came from a Global Flood.
All dating by Evolutionists is made to fit their own evolutionary paradigm.
223
posted on
05/31/2007 5:51:48 AM PDT
by
fortheDeclaration
(We must beat the Democrats or the country will be ruined! -Abe Lincoln)
To: ColdWater
Perhaps you didnt realize that John and Jan are the one and the same. Very dishonest And all evolutionists are honest-LOL!
Stop the smearing and deal with the issues.
Now, lets get down to the essential issue, either God is impossible or Evolution is.
Both views are faith based.
224
posted on
05/31/2007 6:03:24 AM PDT
by
fortheDeclaration
(We must beat the Democrats or the country will be ruined! -Abe Lincoln)
To: THEUPMAN
The basic theme of redemtion relies on the first man. If there was no literal first man then there is no original sin ... no need for a saviour ... the whole thing is bunk. So ... is Christianity a moral guide? Or is it the way to eternal life .. the door? Amen.
225
posted on
05/31/2007 6:05:14 AM PDT
by
fortheDeclaration
(We must beat the Democrats or the country will be ruined! -Abe Lincoln)
To: mad_as_he$$
Ok so you didn't threaten me (not my opinion, but for the sake of the discussion I will concede the point)- don't preach to me. Ok so if you are so good with the Bible answer this for me. do you believe EVERY word of the Bible to be true and exactly what your God wanted to relay to you? If so please state the version you believe in so I can be sure we are discussing the same thing. Yes, I believe every word in the Bible is true and I believe the King James Bible is that perfect Bible in English.
226
posted on
05/31/2007 6:06:41 AM PDT
by
fortheDeclaration
(We must beat the Democrats or the country will be ruined! -Abe Lincoln)
To: fortheDeclaration
Now stop kidding will you! All dating by Evolutionist are based on assumptions of what is being dated.You have already admitted that you were ignorant in the technicalities of dating, so give it a rest.
To: GraniteStateConservative
You talk about fairy tales! That's some tasty irony! Yummo! Well, one of us is believing in a fairy tale, either God's creation or Evolution, where nature' is the 'creator'.
Now, the problem is, where did 'nature' come from in the first place?
228
posted on
05/31/2007 6:08:30 AM PDT
by
fortheDeclaration
(We must beat the Democrats or the country will be ruined! -Abe Lincoln)
To: fortheDeclaration
>>Yes, I believe every word in the Bible is true and I believe the King James Bible is that perfect Bible in English.<<
Here is where God made the animals after he made Adam.
18: And the LORD God said, It is not good that the man should be alone; I will make him an help meet for him.
19: And out of the ground the LORD God formed every beast of the field, and every fowl of the air; and brought them unto Adam to see what he would call them: and whatsoever Adam called every living creature, that was the name thereof.
To: GraniteStateConservative
I explained how something came from nothing. The all powerful Big Dino in the Sky created everything, first the dinosaurs after his own image, and then later man and the sky-god for man. Theres no other possible explanation. Im sure you agree. Well, no, my explaination comes from Genesis 1:1.
But your explaination is as good as any Evolutionist can come up with!
Just throw in some species becoming other, more complex species.
230
posted on
05/31/2007 6:11:01 AM PDT
by
fortheDeclaration
(We must beat the Democrats or the country will be ruined! -Abe Lincoln)
To: fortheDeclaration
Now, lets get down to the essential issue, either God is impossible or Evolution is. Why are you limiting the powers of God? Could not God be controlling evolution?
To: fortheDeclaration
I know enough about it to know that it is a fact that the evolutionists have to assume that the dates on the RadioCarbon dating are not being affected by changes that came from a Global Flood. Repeat: There is NO archeological or geological evidence for your flood. NOTHING in ancient Chinese or Egyptian history to indicate such a catastrophe.
To: fortheDeclaration
We have as much real evidence for a global Flood as we do for Evolution!Since you claim there is no evidence for evolution, you are saying that there is no evidence for the flood.
To: ColdWater
>>Yes, I believe every word in the Bible is true and I believe the King James Bible is that perfect Bible in English.<<
Here is where God made the animals after he made Adam. 18: And the LORD God said, It is not good that the man should be alone; I will make him an help meet for him. 19: And out of the ground the LORD God formed every beast of the field, and every fowl of the air; and brought them unto Adam to see what he would call them: and whatsoever Adam called every living creature, that was the name thereof.
Do you now want to discuss Bible issues?
This was the naming process and those animals were created specifically to be named.
The animal creation had already been created, Adam and the woman being last-each according to its own kind
You will note that the woman was created, not from the ground, but from Adam, and then was named.
234
posted on
05/31/2007 6:18:34 AM PDT
by
fortheDeclaration
(We must beat the Democrats or the country will be ruined! -Abe Lincoln)
To: ColdWater
We have as much real evidence for a global Flood as we do for Evolution! Since you claim there is no evidence for evolution, you are saying that there is no evidence for the flood. Are you admitting that there is no evidence for Evolution?
235
posted on
05/31/2007 6:20:51 AM PDT
by
fortheDeclaration
(We must beat the Democrats or the country will be ruined! -Abe Lincoln)
To: ColdWater
Now, lets get down to the essential issue, either God is impossible or Evolution is. Why are you limiting the powers of God? Could not God be controlling evolution? No, God does not work through evolution.
Each creature reproduces according to its own kind.
It is either God or evolution.
I am not limiting God's power, I am going by what He said.
236
posted on
05/31/2007 6:22:56 AM PDT
by
fortheDeclaration
(We must beat the Democrats or the country will be ruined! -Abe Lincoln)
To: ColdWater
Now stop kidding will you! All dating by Evolutionist are based on assumptions of what is being dated.
You have already admitted that you were ignorant in the technicalities of dating, so give it a rest.
Stop your lying.
The 'technicalities' have nothing to do with the assumptions and you know it.
Stop trying to blow smoke.
I know enough about it to know that the Flood would have affected the dating.
Just like other factors affect the dating.
237
posted on
05/31/2007 6:26:37 AM PDT
by
fortheDeclaration
(We must beat the Democrats or the country will be ruined! -Abe Lincoln)
To: fortheDeclaration
The way you all are talkin’ it’s hard to tell who’s who in this “discussion”.
There is so much not known by either those who argue “evolutionism” or “creationism”. Most of this argument by “evolutionist scientists” is for the purpose of demonstrating to the rest of us that there is no God. Most of the “creationist” argument is to say that their intrepretation of Biblical passages is absolutely the “correct” interpretation. In most of these arguments it becomes clear that neither side knows much. God knows...let’s let Him sort it out. And btw, there is little or no real science in any of the arguments that I see, read on the subject.
The Bible says that a day is coming when the Lion and the Lamb will lie down together; will that day also see the creationist and the evolutionist also finally coming together?
To: fortheDeclaration
Are you admitting that there is no evidence for Evolution?No. But you claimed there was no evidence for the flood.
To: fortheDeclaration
I know enough about it to know that the Flood would have affected the dating. Repeat. There is NO archeological or geological evidence of the flood.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220, 221-240, 241-260 ... 341-359 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson