“My point is that for Ron Paul to avoid being sucked under the waves, he needs to clarify his remarks so as to leave no doubt that he has nothing in common with those who wear tin foil hats and claim that tens of thousands of people have all kept silent about a scheme to (allegedly) murder 3,000 of their former citizens”
Kind of difficult for LRonPaul to do that. He’s listed as a contributer on LewRockewell’s website and Justin Raimondo’s Antiwar.com website. Both of those sites are overun with conspiracy theorists. In fact, Raimondo used to post all those 9/11 conspiracies (the jews did it, it was a cruise missile, etc.,) here on Free Republic until Jim Rob banned him. I just don’t see how Paul can credibly deny any linkage with the conspiracy theorists when he contributes to their websites.
I just don't see how Paul can credibly deny any linkage with the conspiracy theorists when he contributes to their websites.It's as with the democrats; 'they' claim to support the troops but do not support the mission.
LRon Paul would seem to be supporting those with an alternative 'truther' view but he 'says', obviously for public consumption (self-survival motives kicking in), that he does not support their views.
Privately, he must support their views, therefore, he is aligned with the truthers.