Also, I was very unimpressed by the link you provided me. It comes across as just another screed from another nutjob.
If this is the kind of opinion that comes from the "Ron Paul" base, I can see I have even more reasons NOT to support him.
My article quotes in its entirety, a piece written by one of the chief gurus of the movement. Do you deny that Irving Kristol, father of William Kristol, well recognized as also being in the movement, has some credentials in that movement? If one cannot refer to how he defines his movement, what would you have one refer to?
If you are looking, just to bandy insults, be my guest. Take your best shot at my article, and I might just take the time to respond. I certainly will, if you make any points that deserve a response.
For others who want to judge for themselves, here is the link again: The Neocon Phenomenon. Of course, I am not speaking for the Paul campaign, only myself. I support Ron Paul, but have no authority to speak for him. He does a good enough job doing that for himself.
William Flax