[Ohioan]

How can you type such nonsense, when the group define themselves in a way that is specifically not Conservative, yet insist on describing themselves as new Conservatives? (The "Neocon" label is the one they adopted. Read my linked analysis, which quotes Kristol on the subject.)

That some of them are descended from Jewish families is hardly relevant to what they stand for. Trotsky, himself, had Jewish lineage. That hardly made the vicious Communist a spokesman for Jews. Nor is there anything anti-Jewish, in denouncing that Communist or his latter day admirers today. You are seeking to divert attention from what the group stands for, by injecting a total "red herring." Why do you want to divert attention from the actual issues?

[unspun]

Very, very few people have decided to call themselves "neoconservative," compared to those who are call that by liberals and isolationist libertarians.