I think this writer is on crack. Marxism is an economic theory and the neocon movement is a belief that we should act preemptively in the world.
"Neo-conservatism" is more complex than that. It is rooted in a philosophy of big-government globalism that has no basis in U.S. Constitutional law. This is why, for example, you never hear neo-conservatives in the media supporting strict constructionism as a constitutional philosophy, and why most neo-cons have no problem with blatant violations of constitutional law (like gun control).
I don't know if that makes them "Marxists," but it sure as hell doesn't make them "conservative" in any sense, either.
“neocon movement is a belief that we should act preemptively in the world”
Well said.
And I’m much more of a ‘Taft’ or Paleocon; but I think that’s the best one sentence definition I’ve seen.
And proponents of both views are authoritarian statists of the worst stripe, fit only to be fishfood.