Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Sir Francis Dashwood

Taking a break from talking about fetishes? Short-lived break, I see.


686 posted on 05/28/2007 7:41:13 AM PDT by ahayes ("Impenetrability! That's what I say!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 683 | View Replies ]


To: ahayes
Taking a break from talking about fetishes? Short-lived break, I see.

You have trouble with the language?

When you grow up someday and read what a fetish is and your daddy tells you about the birds and the bees, you might know.

Until then, it is like this...

Your problem is that you want to deny that reality. You cannot play god with the creation of life as a homosexual, you are denied connection with the eternal in a temporal, procreant sense. Yet you will continue to reach out for the eternal with a fetish (an object of worship).

It is no more real than those things that seem to appear before us in a dream.

It is funny that a supposed lesbian takes a man's sperm into her vagina then continues to fantasize she did it without a man. The same is true for male homosexuals - - they cannot reproduce without a real vagina, they have no womb and never will... they must submit to the order of nature and do so while continuing to lie to themselves and everyone else about it.

It is as I said, that baby boy is a fantasy object, a fetish for two perverts who deny the natural order of this world.

Nature does not require your permission. It is not even asked for.

687 posted on 05/28/2007 7:53:11 AM PDT by Sir Francis Dashwood (LET'S ROLL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 686 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson