Mary Cheney Gives Birth to Baby Boy

WashPost ^ | Wednesday, May 23, 2007; 5:36 PM | Staff

[Sir Francis Dashwood]

I have to check and see if I have mistakenly logged into my Taliban forum.

So, you are the new Rosie O'Donnell wing of the GOP who equates the Christians with the Taliban???

That little baby boy is just a fantasy object, a fetish for two perverts to parade around...

I pity him...

P.S. I am an atheist, so spare the religion bashing.

[LightBeam]

As a pro-life, pro-business, pro-Iraq War Catholic who has never voted for a Democrat in all her voting years, I seriously doubt I belong at DU.

Well, you certainly seem to use their talking points when it comes to Traditioal Morality.

And you have a very perverse idea of what constitutes abusive.

Its not my idea. Its God's idea. He's revealed his ideas in the Bible. You might want to read it sometime, if Papa Ratzinger will let you.

[LightBeam]

Way to push people over to the other side! Remember, in elections it’s the guy with the most votes who wins.

I'm not "pushing people over to the other side."

If the poster in question can't tell the difference between Traditional Morality and a theocracy, then she's already on the other side.

[LightBeam]

I just wonder when it will become considered hate speech and illegal to preach against homosexuality in church. It can't be far off. Even in conservative circles, Christains are being called terrorists.

I agree 100%.

I'm honestly having a hard time understanding how people on a supposedly conservative forum are defending these women as they bring a child into the world to flaunt their depraved lifestyles.

I don't blame the real conservatives here, though. I blame a group I call "Republicans-First". They support Mary Cheney in her shame because her dad is a Republican. If she were the daughter of a prominent 'rat politican, you can be sure everyone here would rightly condemn her as just another nail in the coffin of our nation's values.

Some people just put party over principal, and thats sad.

[cammie]

Ah, I see you’re an anti-Catholic bigot. Nice mouth.

[beckysueb]

You are so right. This is the first time I have come across people defending homos in this forum. I think because before the gays in question were democrats. I have been called a hatemonger, terrorist, bigot, and ignorant among other things. I’m having a hard time with this. I don’t understand it.

[Nasty McPhilthy]

For the record, just exactly what are you inseminating by that? ;-)

[Front 242]

Thank you beckysueb ...

It took me about an hour to write and I had to go back several times to try and clarify the point I was trying to make. I do feel that I may have come across as a bit sanctimonious in my delivery, but alas, I acknowledge that I am a sinner myself. Thank you again for your kind comments.

Take care and PEACE,

Front 242

[Front 242]

beckysueb ...

You wrote in Post 556:

“But of course, you will have the defenders in here splitting hairs and trying to tear down your excellent analysis.”

My reply would be “BRING EM ON!” The martyrs of the past and the present timeperiod have endured much, much worse with regard to being the recipients of persecution ... Jesus was the pinnacle of suffering for what he taught ... to the point of death upon the Cross. We need to humble ourselves and accept our own crosses to bear and to assist others who are struggling in carrying their crosses. (I elaborate a little further in my “About Me” Free Republic member info section ... just click on my alias).

Sooo ... if anyone out there wants to split hairs, lets get it on! (Insert wrestling announcer’s voice over a megaphone here: “ARE YOU READY TO RUUUUUUUMBLE?!”).

Peace out,

Front 242

[beckysueb]

Thanks for the backup!

[cammie]

We don’t know what’s in her heart because only God can see what is in people’s hearts, why they do what they do, and what makes someone tick. And because we can’t see into anyone’s heart, it’s wrong for us to judge them. We can disagree with their actions (as some have done on this thread in a non-condemnatory way), but condemning them as a person (which many have done on this thread) is a non-starter. It’s not a cop out; it’s really fairly simple to understand, if you have any desire to understand it.

[beckysueb]

And because we can’t see into anyone’s heart, it’s wrong for us to judge them.

The Lord sayeth "Ye shall know them by the fruits of their labor."

[Front 242]

No problemo beckysueb,

I have noticed that it seems as if the Free Republic website has been infiltrated by elements who don’t seem to subscribe to the tenents of what this site is all about. I first came to this site several years ago and participated in various forums, but quickly grew tired of all of the bickering. I then took a couple of years off from accessing the Free Republic Forums until the Virginia Tech massacre occurred last month (I was curious about what the intense response would be).

What really surprises me is the large influx of new Free Republic members who seem to be here only to agitate others with far left or liberal viewpoints ... I thought that this was a Conservative Issues Forum. I’m not a conspiracy theorist or a paranoid individual, but it seems like there is an infestation of some type going on.

(Front 242 moseys to the garage to get an industrial-size aerosol roach-killing fog bomb and drops it into the cyberworld of the Free Republic Forums). :)

Front 242

[beckysueb]

I’ve noticed the same thing. Of course, everyone is entitled to their opinion. It just sort of amazed me that Freepers are no longer on the same page. And what is the worst is that anyone who tries to stand up for whats right or has a different view is called names and made to feel like a jerk. I took a break from FR for awhile, too, but I came in one day and got hooked all over again. I guess its time for another break. I just think that some people are so misguided and if we can touch even one person then we have done good.

[Front 242]

I wholeheartedly agree with you and concur with regard to possibly trying to make contact or reach someone here on this forum on a personal level in order to make them “think” or to develop as an individual. I think that I might just be joining you on that Free Republic sabbatical. I think that I’ll head for the south island of New Zealand and become a monk / hermit. :)

[IIntense]

...but this is preferable to a screwed up "straight" family.

Single women who resort to providing their child with a sperm donor for a "dad" truly cheat this innocent child.

The fact that some "on-the-scene" fathers (and sometimes mothers) deserve to be hung by their toes does not condone "sperm donor" fathers. Having a child by those means does nothing to help kids who have bad parents. It doesn't relate.

[IIntense]

...it's not up to me to judge...

I've never met a person who does not judge others' behaviours.

For instance, your neighbor goes shopping while her little ones are down for a nap...alone in the house. Someone else gives their four-year-old the freedom to wander and play on other streets...alone. Nearby, some "brain-dead" person allows their dog to bark incessantly. Then we have those folks who thinks its okay if their dog thinks your yard is it's bathroom.

I could write pages; we all could. Judging is human nature. One would have to be created as a rock not to get frustrated, annoyed, and yes, judgemental.

[IIntense]

The comment was that single persons should not raise children "period".

I don't recall saying that. Some parents with young children sadly become widowed. Some get divorced, whether or not they wanted this; some take their children and leave abusive spouses. In effect, they become single people with children.

Who, in their right mind, would believe all of them should give away their children to a married man and woman? That's ludricous.

I respectfully suggest you're playing games with the facts by using a hypothetical situation.