Posted on 05/23/2007 2:34:43 PM PDT by SmithL
She means, she din't want to see herself as a gonefromtheSenater.
Considering her duties and responsibilities, shouldn't medication that disorients & impairs her, especially (supposedly) without her knowledge of being impaired & disoriented, be a factor in whether or not to elect her?
Self-serving B*@#H.
The leukemia defense?
It is wise not to take her statement at face value. Unfortunately, politicans are not known for being straightforward when they get into trouble.
She may indeed be telling the truth. But that also damns her reckless judgment.
Better odds betting on roulette than a pol's honesty.
Not necessarily the first time.
She doesn’t remember, remember?
It could have happened innumerable (Remember, ZERO is a number that can’t be enumuerated, too. LOL) times in the past that she neither remembers nor caused a noticible stir...
...except maybe when she wandered into the Assembly Chambers, and pressed the ‘AYE’ button on an absent Republican’s seat, thus illegally voting for a bill she had introduced into the Senate.
Another Democrat elitist who had leukemia
austin democrat dies http://www.statesman.com/news/content/news/stories/local/05/23/23rubenjohnson.html
Thanks. I can only imagine how the Statesman would eulogize a Republican who had been caught in kickbacks and bank fraud schemes.
“OPHELIA” I must have been in one of my stupors when I wrote that.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.