Skip to comments.
Stennis, Nimitz and Bonhomme Richard Enter the Persian Gulf
Navy Newsstand ^
| 5/23/2007
| U.S. Naval Forces Central Command/U.S. 5th Fleet
Posted on 05/23/2007 11:11:26 AM PDT by Excuse_My_Bellicosity
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-83 next last
070522-N-8157C-240 ARABIAN SEA (May 22, 2007) - (from foreground) USS Nimitz (CVN 68), USS Bonhomme Richard (LHD 6) and USS John C. Stennis (CVN 74) transit the Gulf of Oman. The three ships are flagships for three different strike groups; the Nimitz Carrier Strike Group, Bonhomme Richard Expeditionary Strike Group, and the John C. Stennis Carrier Strike Group, which are on regularly, scheduled deployments in support of Maritime Operations. Maritime Operations help set the conditions for security and stability, as well as complement counter-terrorism and security efforts to regional nations. U.S. Navy photo by Mass Communication Specialist 1st Class Denny Cantrell (RELEASED)
To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity; jazusamo; Girlene; pinkpanther111; lilycicero; freema; ticked; peod
3rd Battalion, 1st Marine RegimentGod bless 'em all.
2
posted on
05/23/2007 11:18:37 AM PDT
by
RedRover
(Defend Our Marines)
To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity
I’ll bet the nuts of all iranians shriveled up. LOL.
3
posted on
05/23/2007 11:18:51 AM PDT
by
gate2wire
To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity
That’s the sexiest thing I’ve seen in a long time.
4
posted on
05/23/2007 11:18:56 AM PDT
by
FremontLives
(The eagle never lost so much time as when he submitted to learn from the crow.)
To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity
That’s some serious striking power. Guess we’re showing the world that we mean business.
5
posted on
05/23/2007 11:22:12 AM PDT
by
wbill
To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity
what they did not indicate in the ship count was how many SSN’s are patrolling around the ESG and CSG. (Good thing - thet the Iranians guess)
6
posted on
05/23/2007 11:22:12 AM PDT
by
roaddog727
(BullS##t does not get bridges built)
To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity
“The timing of this exercise is determined by the availability of forces, and is not connected to events in the region. The exercise is not directed against any nation. “ (wink, wink...nod, nod)
Yeah, right...
7
posted on
05/23/2007 11:24:04 AM PDT
by
BwanaNdege
(Old Chinese curse "may you live in interesting times..." These are they!)
To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity
8
posted on
05/23/2007 11:25:49 AM PDT
by
mewzilla
(Property must be secured or liberty cannot exist. John Adams)
To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity
9
posted on
05/23/2007 11:35:13 AM PDT
by
brothers4thID
(FDT: "Every notice that while our problems are getting bigger, our politicians are getting smaller?")
To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity
Thats a very busy piece of airspace today....(chuckle)
10
posted on
05/23/2007 11:37:30 AM PDT
by
Badeye
(You know its a kook site when they ban the word 'kook')
To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity
Give ‘em hell, Navy!
...you too Marines!
from former Army paratrooper.
To: brothers4thID
12
posted on
05/23/2007 11:40:55 AM PDT
by
Diogenesis
(Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum)
To: Badeye
Sphincter pressure forcasts for the week range from 9.2 to an all time high of 9.99 in Tehran, on accuweather’s new Sphinctometer 3000.
To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity
Unfortunately in the relatively claustrophobic Persian Gulf, they make a pretty enticing target for some Sunburn anti-ship missiles.
14
posted on
05/23/2007 11:41:45 AM PDT
by
rednesss
To: rednesss
There’s a plan for that. And a plan for anything that goes sideways with the first plan.
For the price of considerably less than a fighter plane, the Iranians could send a $5 billion dollar aircraft carrier to the bottom of the gulf with these Russian made Sunburn missiles. Industry analysts say that the Navy has no defense for these small Mach 2+ missiles. Scary stuff.
16
posted on
05/23/2007 11:45:13 AM PDT
by
rednesss
To: rednesss
Yeah, I thought of that also. However, should that happen some nasty stuff would be coming down the pike one would imagine. As an AF type, I don’t know much about defenses against anti-ship missiles, but I would bet my garrison cap there are plenty.
God’s speed sailors and Marines.
17
posted on
05/23/2007 11:45:31 AM PDT
by
alarm rider
(Why should I not vote my conscience?)
To: epluribus_2
(chuckle)
Makes me want to pull out my old cruise book seeing these pics.
18
posted on
05/23/2007 11:48:17 AM PDT
by
Badeye
(You know its a kook site when they ban the word 'kook')
To: rednesss
In a confined space like the Persian Gulf, it’s about one minute from launch-to-target for the Sunburn.
These sailors are going to have to be on hair-trigger alert 24/7.
19
posted on
05/23/2007 11:57:04 AM PDT
by
gridlock
(How often must environmentalism have negative consequences before we stop calling them unintended?)
To: alarm rider
The problem is that these missiles travel so fast that they estimate a ship to have between 25-30 seconds in order to respond to it. It’s only 56 kilometers wide at the Strait of Hormuz. At Mach 3, which they say the “Mosquito” can travel at, it would take it approximately 1 minute to cross that distance. And they probably have to travel through a shipping channel deep enough somewhere toward the middle.
20
posted on
05/23/2007 11:57:14 AM PDT
by
rednesss
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-83 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson