I take it you have a problem with people who formulate theories based on existing evidence but don’t state them as absolute fact.
Do you, then, support the notion that people should look at evidence and immediately (and arrogantly) claim that they have all of the answers? That doesn’t seem to leave any room for refining the theory based on new evidence, and that would be bad science.
I have a problem with people who formulate theories with SO MANY guesses and assumptions, each one built upon the next.
(Re-read the article.)