Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 05/21/2007 5:48:18 PM PDT by nypokerface
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: nypokerface

Somewhere in this is an episode of “Dirty Jobs.”


2 posted on 05/21/2007 5:56:30 PM PDT by NewHampshireDuo (Earth - Taking care of itself since 4.6 billion BC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nypokerface

I’ve been saying for years WE’VE got coal right here in the US of A,let’s figure out how to use the stuff. I suspect our friends in the oil industry have had at least a small influence on why we haven’t investigated this alternative closer but when gas and oil products get high enough to cripple the economy maybe we’ll reconsider !!!


3 posted on 05/21/2007 6:03:01 PM PDT by Obie Wan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nypokerface
This is what our arabian sand...uh...dwellers fear the most.

Do it.

4 posted on 05/21/2007 6:06:51 PM PDT by stboz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nypokerface
Back in 1949, the Bureau of the Mines in Louisville, Missouri  put together a
demonstration plant to produce gasoline from coal.  Raw coal was first crushed to about 3/4 inch size and then pulverized in a ball-mill  to less than 60 mesh, then dried to 1 or 2 percent moisture content.  This is mixed with a small quantity of catalyst, such as iron oxide or tin oxalate, and with a heavy oil into a paste containing about 47 percent solids.  Steam-driven pumps at 10,000 psi force this paste into a radiant-type heater in which the high pressure tubing is protected by a superheated jacket.
  The plant was designed to work at 700 atmospheres or over 10,000 lb. pressure, in two major steps.  This liquefies the coal and produces gasoline and its by-products.  The output of the plant was from 300 barrels of gasoline  per day depending on the coal used and the catalyst used.  Taken from
ENCARTA 2004 by Microsoft.
 
7 posted on 05/21/2007 6:13:03 PM PDT by granite ("We dare not tempt them with weakness" - JFK)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nypokerface

Making the fuel American DEMS won’t make.


9 posted on 05/21/2007 6:25:51 PM PDT by bmwcyle (Satan is working both sides of the street in World Socialism and World Courts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nypokerface

*psst* ...biodiesel... US restaurants produce 28,000,000,000 gallons of used cooking oil per year... pass it on


10 posted on 05/21/2007 6:33:03 PM PDT by pabianice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nypokerface

bump


14 posted on 05/21/2007 7:25:37 PM PDT by VOA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nypokerface; thackney; Red Badger

Bump


25 posted on 05/21/2007 8:11:23 PM PDT by CPT Clay (Drill ANWR, Personal Accounts NOW.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nypokerface

Thanks for posting, will read into.


29 posted on 05/21/2007 8:39:42 PM PDT by Rick_Michael (Fred Thompson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sully777; Fierce Allegiance; vigl; Cagey; Abathar; A. Patriot; B Knotts; getsoutalive; ...

Rest In Peace, old friend, your work is finished.......

If you want on or off the DIESEL "KnOcK" LIST just FReepmail me........

This is a fairly HIGH VOLUME ping list on some days......

HAT TIP TO NYPOKERFACE!.....

31 posted on 05/22/2007 5:01:36 AM PDT by Red Badger (My gerund got caught in my diphthong, and now I have a dangling participle...............)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nypokerface

IT’S ABOUT TIME!!!!!.......


32 posted on 05/22/2007 5:02:58 AM PDT by Red Badger (My gerund got caught in my diphthong, and now I have a dangling participle...............)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nypokerface

So, we could produce fuel from an abundant domestic resource for a turbo charged compression ignition engine that today can be designed to be very clean burning, get 40+MPG, carry 4 passengers and be reliable for 500,000+ miles with minimal maintenance.

I can’t imagine who would be opposed to such an advancement as that! /s

It’s going to take some serious American entrepreneur spirit to overcome the forces opposing this type of innovation. Technologically speaking, this isn’t a gamble. It is very doable.


35 posted on 05/22/2007 5:16:04 AM PDT by IamConservative (I could never be a liar; there's too much to remember.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Miss Marple

What do you think?


36 posted on 05/22/2007 2:51:05 PM PDT by CPT Clay (Drill ANWR, Personal Accounts NOW.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nypokerface

This idea makes a lot of sense as the US has nearly 300 years worth of coal and declining oil production. There technology is very well-established and has been practiced on a large-scale in South Africa for over 50 years. The only issue is the high capital cost of the plants and the time needed to build them and bring them on-stream. Because of this, it might be decades before a significant fraction of our gasoline could be produced from coal.”


39 posted on 05/22/2007 4:16:28 PM PDT by pesto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson