Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Expert says Brazil could meet world's gas needs
Spero News ^ | May 21, 2007 | Robert Duncan

Posted on 05/21/2007 1:10:52 PM PDT by The Ghost of JG

“For me it’s not too clear why some people are making bio-fuels,” said Cortez. “If you are making fuel from corn, then really you are just making a disguised gas,” which has high emissions.

Cortez argued that bio-fuels should only be made if they are “clean,” with a policy to lower emissions.

According to Cortez, for this reason the use of corn for the production of bio-fuels is not ideal, whereas sugar-cane could be. Otherwise it is just a policy to meet “social demands,” Cortez said, alluding to recent measures in the United States to implement funding of bio-fuels.

“It is very wrong to make bio-fuels from food crops. You have to design and develop an industry that is responsible,” Cortez said. “If we want to be serious about bio-diesel, then we need to redraw the entire industry.”

(Excerpt) Read more at speroforum.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: biofuels; brazil; cornlobby; energy; ethanol
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

1 posted on 05/21/2007 1:10:53 PM PDT by The Ghost of JG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: The Ghost of JG

Sugar cane is a food crop, genius.


2 posted on 05/21/2007 1:15:31 PM PDT by wideawake ("Pearl Harbor is America's fault, right, Mommy?" - Ron Paul, age 6, 12/7/1941)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Ghost of JG
“I have made the calculations. If one-fourth of Brazil’s territory were planted for bio-fuels we could provide the entire world’s needs for gas,” said Professor Luis Cortez

Were these calculations done while consuming ethanol, by any chance?
3 posted on 05/21/2007 1:16:32 PM PDT by P-40 (Al Qaeda was working in Iraq. They were just undocumented.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Ghost of JG

Too bad our Congress, a Division of ADM, has such high tariffs against Brazilian eth!


4 posted on 05/21/2007 1:17:28 PM PDT by pikachu (Take advantage of Global Warming by purchasing Ocean view property in Denver today!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Ghost of JG
then really you are just making a disguised gas,” which has high emissions.

That's what I said about the demoniac-rats in 1968.

5 posted on 05/21/2007 1:23:08 PM PDT by Risky-Riskerdo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pikachu

That tariff expires in 2009. if I remember correctly. Right now they can just send their ethanol for drying to a neighboring CBI country and avoid the tariff.


6 posted on 05/21/2007 1:24:55 PM PDT by P-40 (Al Qaeda was working in Iraq. They were just undocumented.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: The Ghost of JG

If ethanol for fuel is such a great idea, why not make it out of ethane from natural gas, and ozone? That would give us fuel, plus drinking alcohol, PLUS fresh air....pure oxygen! C2H6 + O3 = C2H5OH + O2 In refinery volumes! Believe it!


7 posted on 05/21/2007 1:26:33 PM PDT by 2harddrive (...House a TOTAL Loss.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2harddrive

How much energy is consumed in the production compared to the energy available in the product?


8 posted on 05/21/2007 2:08:33 PM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: pikachu

Their energy indepedence is mostly due to oil production, not ethanol.


9 posted on 05/21/2007 8:44:51 PM PDT by Rick_Michael (Fred Thompson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: The Ghost of JG

Brazil is showing us how it’s done.

Sorry, but that’s a fact.


10 posted on 05/21/2007 8:47:43 PM PDT by Cringing Negativism Network (D is for Defeatism. R is for Reconquista.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wideawake

Happy to see that you are still around!


11 posted on 05/21/2007 8:51:59 PM PDT by Clemenza (Rudy Giuliani, like Pesto and Seattle, belongs in the scrap heap of '90s Culture)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Cringing Negativism Network

The Whole Ethanol/sugar cane scenario isn’t flying in the states because the MPG is less it cost More to Produce then the Distribution system is not their but through trucks not pipelines and CO2 impact by that elimantes any Benefit of lower CO2 which is the ultimate excersize..

BTW have you ever smelled Cooked Sugar cane or sugar Cane exhaust it is obnoxious....


12 posted on 05/21/2007 9:05:46 PM PDT by philly-d-kidder (In the theatre..in Kuwait!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: philly-d-kidder

Please correct me if I’m wrong. I’m under the impression that if I were to, today, buy a fuel-efficient diesel powered small car, I could:

1) Run it on vegetable oil, purchased straight from the grocery store. (I live in a temperate climate)

2) Pay less per gallon of vegetable oil, than gas costs now (even before it goes up again).

3) Get significantly better mileage / gallon of vegetable oil, than an equivalent car would in gas.

No?

If that’s true (and I think it is), the free market is about to go absolutely *wild* responding to this opportunity.

Fortunes are about to be made.

Serious fortunes.

Like, Microsoft. IBM. Standard Oil, type fortunes.

Will American companies lead the way?


13 posted on 05/21/2007 9:12:11 PM PDT by Cringing Negativism Network (D is for Defeatism. R is for Reconquista.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: The Ghost of JG
“If you are making fuel from corn, then really you are just making a disguised gas,” which has high emissions.

The idea is that in burning a bio-fuel you are releasing carbon that that was taken up when the crop grew. The carbon cycle is crop -> Fuel -> atmosphere -> crop; with no net increase in atmospheric carbon. The Blow-back is higher prices for food crops and clearing of land to plant the crops.

14 posted on 05/21/2007 10:24:15 PM PDT by Mike Darancette (Democrat Happens!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rick_Michael
Their energy indepedence is mostly due to oil production, not ethanol.

Bingo. When da Silva declared energy independence for Brazil, he did it on an oil platform.
15 posted on 05/21/2007 10:27:37 PM PDT by July 4th (A vacant lot cancelled out my vote for Bush.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Cringing Negativism Network

Their energy indepedence is mostly due to oil production, not ethanol.
^^
To say it again....


16 posted on 05/21/2007 10:35:59 PM PDT by Rick_Michael (Fred Thompson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: July 4th

Most people believe in the illusion because it’s huge propaganda for the left.

Nothing wrong with alternatives, and I’m totally for them...they just have to make sense and demonstrate competitive cost.


17 posted on 05/21/2007 10:37:30 PM PDT by Rick_Michael (Fred Thompson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Rick_Michael

What is or national trade deficit?

What is our national trade deficit in oil?

We need to declare independence from foreign oil.

We need to start now.

If we wait until our supply is disrupted, as it without question will be, at some point, it will be too late.

This is not about tree-hugging leftists.

It’s national security.

We really, really need to stop funding our enemies.


18 posted on 05/21/2007 10:39:45 PM PDT by Cringing Negativism Network (D is for Defeatism. R is for Reconquista.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Cringing Negativism Network

Agreed, but the methods of doing so vary. I favor the most efficient manner possible....Brazil isn’t necessarily that example.


19 posted on 05/22/2007 12:21:02 AM PDT by Rick_Michael (Fred Thompson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Cringing Negativism Network

I wish vegetable or palm oil in Malaysia Indonesia worked as well.... I thougt Ethanol is coming up like 30% short in MPG...and it is subsidized by 41 cents a Gallon.. plus 49 cents in state federal sales and excise tax not real competitive. almost a Buck in taxes...

The critical thing for all this is no environmental Impact after factoring in Fertilizera nd trucking system for delivery since pipelines not built..


20 posted on 05/22/2007 3:18:04 AM PDT by philly-d-kidder (In the theatre..in Kuwait!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson