I’m not trying to “convince” anyone. I’m just stating the truth as I know it from reading Rehnquist’s final opinion on the subject of abortion. Anyone who cares to check my facts is welcome to read Rehnquist’s opinion for themselves.
When the subject is constitutional law, I always encourage people to read the documents for themselves.
John / Billybob
You are, as usual John, absolutely correct. Rhenquist did support the stare decicis of abortion except he was obviously seeking a case with which to set Roe aside but which case could not be ruled properly until the activist judges (G, S, B) could be cancelled. The court is still not in a posture to over turn Roe, needing one more strict constructionist judge.
I always enjoy your posts on the SCOTUS since you have direct experience before the court.