Posted on 05/18/2007 5:59:32 PM PDT by wagglebee
You’re not allowed to question him though. He can beat Hillary.
Every baby killing politician says the same thing, that they are personally opposed to it but they support a womans right to choose. It was bull shit when the first pol utered it and it still is.
I have 4 grown children, 12 grand children and 1.5 great grand children, I’ve held every one of them shortly after their birth ( Except for the one that’s on the way) I’ve prayed for every single one of them since before they were born. They are all precious, every single life is precious.
Any politician that believes otherwise will never get my vote or support. and that includes Rudy if he gets the nomination. The lesser of two evils is still evil.
Of course, he was too scared to actually challenge her in 2000 and 2006.
You Rudybots can jump in any time now.
If he “hates abortion” then why give $$$ to Planned Parenthood? Actions speak louder than words.
Bingo! How I wish he were the Senator from NY, and not her. But he just couldn't find the stones to oppose her.
I never said the media doesn’t care what Rooty thinks about the abortion issue. I never said pro-life conservatives don’t care what Rooty thinks about the abortion issue. That is the predicament that Rooty finds himself in today. He can’t run and hide from the abortion issue.
Rooty`s past record on abortion is something he wanted to keep buried in the past. Time and time again he’s consistently struggled to spin, twist and nuance the abortion issue from every angle. And as we both know, he’s failed miserably.
Rooty would be very happy answering questions about the WOT, national security and homeland security issues. Along with his record on crime, welfare and fiscal matters while he was Mayor.
Rooty is finding out daily that the liberal media and pro-life conservatives won’t let the abortion issue die. For different reasons of course.
To Rudy an unborn baby is 0/5ths human if he considers abortion settled law that should not be changed.
Rudy is not even personally opposed. That creep has addressed NARAL, donated to PP, and offered to abort his grandchild. He is dedicated to preserving “choice” in America, and that is why it doesn’t take much guessing to know he’ll nominate a pro-abort to SCOTUS.
A bittersweet way of stating the truth.
What a great line!
Hello? Anybody out there?
I am waiting for the “voting ONLY ONE ISSUE” statement.
Hardly clear. He’s still tapdancing like Fred Astaire.
You either believe with all your heart it not a human being but a chunk of meat.. so no big to get rid of it...
Or you believe it is a human being and it's state condoned murder on demand
From a purely political point of view, he would be the strongest candidate in the general election. An important part of the "conservative coalition" that Reagan formed are neutral on abortion. Reagan himself soft peddled his pro life views in order to create the "big tent." All of this is moot, however. From the article:
He will bypass early primaries in Iowa, New Hampshire, and South Carolina where pro-life voters predominate and focus instead on the Feb. 5th super primary in states such as New York, California, and New Jersey that allegedly would be more receptive to a pro-abortion candidate.
He does not have a prayer of getting the nomination.
Does he pray?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.