Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

US compromise on immigration heads into rough waters
Yahoo! News/Agence France Press ^ | May 18, 2007 | Antonio Rodriguez

Posted on 05/18/2007 1:58:23 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet

A landmark compromise on the thorny issue of immigration came under scrutiny in Congress Friday as some Republicans slammed the plan as a blanket amnesty and some Democrats argued it did not go far enough.

"The agreement as it stands is hopeless. It is a framework that still has to be fleshed out," said Vanessa Cardenas of the Center for American Progress, after US lawmakers late Thursday struck a deal with the White House on sweeping immigration reform that could allow 12 million illegal immigrants to legalize their status.

The pact, announced by a group of Democratic and Republican senators, would provide a path to permanent residency and citizenship for the vast majority of illegal workers, establish a merit-based points system for future immigrants, and set up a low-wage temporary worker program.

It also would also provide 18,000 more Border Patrol agents, and scores of radar and camera towers on the US border with Mexico.

The deal could hand President George W. Bush one of the few successes in Congress of his second term in office; in the Senate Monday, 60 of 100 members were expected to give a procedural green light for the bill to be debated.

"I look forward to signing this legislation as soon as I can," Bush said on Friday.

Debate will get under way, a legislative source said, but stressed that was no guarantee about terms set out in the deal.

Democratic Majority Leader Harry Reid, who has said he would like to improve the deal with amendments, gave colleagues until next weekend to approve a reform plan apparently in a bid to keep the immigration issue from becoming a focus of campaigning ahead of next year's presidential vote.

Conservative Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney jumped on the issue, saying he was strongly opposed to the deal. But Democrat Hillary Clinton said only that she would analyze the deal carefully -- not if she supported it.

With critics on both sides, Democrat Ted Kennedy and Republican Jon Kyl face an uphill battle for their bill despite being backed by Bush.

"I voted for amnesty in 1986 and learned that illegality only promotes illegality. So I won't repeat the mistake," said Republican Senator Chuck Grassley, referring to a prior effort to allow people in the United States illegally to normalize their status.

Democrat Bob Menendez did not sign on either, despite the fact he was one of his party's lead negotiators on the case in recent weeks.

"I could not sign on to the agreement announced in principle because it tears families apart, says to many that they are only good enough to work here, but not good enough to stay," said Menendez.

Some Democrats have asked for reforms that would allow separated family members to be reunited, and a way for future participants in a temporary workers' program to seek permanent residency, ideas not in the current plan.

Lawmakers and the White House will have to narrow the divide over the details in a few months if they hope to give Bush a deal he can sign before year's end.

The Senate's final version of the deal, once approved, must be debated in the House of Representatives, where the Democrats hold sway. If it is revised a committee must iron out differences between the competing versions, and then put the result before both houses.

Last year immigration reform got bogged down in committee, amid opposition from conservative Republicans, and Cardenas warmed that could happen again.

"Anti-immigrant groups have a strong base that takes action, and politicians listen to them," she said.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Crime/Corruption; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Mexico; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Arizona; US: California; US: New Mexico; US: Texas; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: aliens; amnesty; borders; democrats; doingjobswewontdo; georgebush; gop; illegalaliens; illegalimmigrants; illegalimmigration; jonkyl; mexicans; nomoreborders; republicans; tedkennedy; votethebumsout
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 last
To: 2ndDivisionVet
It's amnesty. That anything close to a majority of any party promoted this mess is a strong indication that our government is totally out of control. They're all on the take, and could care less what the voters think.

The fed has jumped the shark.

41 posted on 05/18/2007 3:54:12 PM PDT by meyer (Bring back the Contract with America and you'll bring back the Republican majority.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PA-RIVER

No many of that 190 million are going on with their lives oblivious to what just happened.


42 posted on 05/18/2007 3:55:05 PM PDT by kalee (The offenses we give, we write in the dust; Those we take, we write in marble. JHuett)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
CALL! CALL! CALL! CALL! AND KEEP CALLING TILL THE LINES FRY!

WRITE! WRITE! WRITE! WRITE! TILL YOU RUN OUT OF INK IN YOUR PEN!

STOP AMNESTY NOW!! WE CAN DO IT!!

43 posted on 05/18/2007 3:56:18 PM PDT by Cacique (quos Deus vult perdere, prius dementat ( Islamia Delenda Est ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tioga
...would pitchforks get us arrested at a protest/demonstration?

Only if you gore the sacred socialist oxen.

44 posted on 05/18/2007 3:57:08 PM PDT by meyer (Bring back the Contract with America and you'll bring back the Republican majority.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

It won’t kill the GOP, but it will be an opportunity for us to purge out of the party those who pretend to be republicans.


45 posted on 05/18/2007 3:57:37 PM PDT by Cacique (quos Deus vult perdere, prius dementat ( Islamia Delenda Est ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Question:

What if the criminal aliens, crooks, terrorists and narco-gangsters don’t want amnesty? Why should they? Wouldn’t they have to pay taxes? How can you force criminals to become citizens? Why would you? If these people really wanted to be real citizens they wouldn’t use phony ID’s.

NO AMNESTY for Employers or Employees!


46 posted on 05/18/2007 4:01:08 PM PDT by Republicus2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cementjungle
I would prefer that Bush spend the rest of his term on vacation than hand us "successes" like this.

I second that and add an amen to it.

47 posted on 05/18/2007 4:11:19 PM PDT by processing please hold (Duncan Hunter '08) (ROP and Open Borders-a terrorist marriage and hell's coming with them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Cacique
It won’t kill the GOP, but it will be an opportunity for us to purge out of the party those who pretend to be republicans.

The first target should be McCain's girlfriend, Lindsay Graham. If after all of his betrayals he doesn't face a conservative primary challenge in a solid red state like SC, then it really is over for the GOP and conservatism.

48 posted on 05/18/2007 4:52:57 PM PDT by Ogie Oglethorpe (2nd Amendment - the reboot button on the U.S. Constitution)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
"This will kill the GOP, IMHO."

It's already dead.

49 posted on 05/18/2007 4:58:16 PM PDT by Czar ( StillFedUptotheTeeth@Washington)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet; All

Duncan Hunter on the Senate Immigration Bill
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mf_TCdzryD8

Duncan Hunter on the Border Fence
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hNGCZ2LoYhU

SC Debate: Hunter on Illegal Immigration
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O3Jmmxg90IA


50 posted on 05/18/2007 6:02:52 PM PDT by LFOD777 (In 2006, Washington spent $2.7 Trillion and ran a $248 billion budget deficit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: M203M4

LOL! Great pictures. I really like your RINO photo. Mind if I link to it?


51 posted on 05/18/2007 10:11:31 PM PDT by de meanr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: stephenjohnbanker

It’s even worse. See this post with Session’s analysis:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1836751/posts


52 posted on 05/20/2007 9:55:39 AM PDT by 3AngelaD (They've screwed up their own countries so bad they had to leave, now they're here screwing up ours.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson