To: syriacus
I guess any form of denying the obvious is considered treason-but Iraq is a lost cause.WE are getting our hats handed to us-in more ways than one-the thing is its impossible and dangerous to leave Iraq such a mess-but the congress and people of the US want it-so I just dont know that we can prevail much longer in Iraq.Oh,im just waiting for September when both dems/repubs demand a pullout.We are in a no win situation in that mud hole of Iraq.Anyone who denies this is blind to our political and military will-America is gone soft.We cant hande 3500 deaths -and this for our very existence to live as we please-If the terrorrists had planes and ships it wouldnt take much of a fight to get them to impose Islam on the soft American people.Why is there even an argument as to who is winning in Iraq when WE clearly are losing-and in all probability will completely lose by September of this year.What a joke !
31 posted on
05/17/2007 1:38:26 PM PDT by
vicosal
(God Bless George Bush...a steadfast principled leader)
To: vicosal
I guess any form of denying the obvious is considered treason-but Iraq is a lost cause.And to think Bush didn't get a chance to
- reinstate the draft or
- impose the severest press censorship,
like Truman's Administration got to do during the Korean war.
The Censorship rules
- Threatened to courtmartial newsmen who deliberately reported any troop movements without authorization.
- Placed correspondents under the complete jusrisdiction of the army and forbade any criticism of the Allied conduct of the war.
- Provided for screening dispatches for military information which might injure morale
- Forbade quoting officers without authorization
- Forbade revealing casualties before official publication
Many more regulations are listed at the link above.
35 posted on
05/17/2007 1:53:04 PM PDT by
syriacus
(Shock a lib today. Hand them a copy of the censorship rules imposed by Truman's govt in Jan., 1951.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson