Then we may have to look elsewhere if the House approves this piece of treason.
You're one of the more informed posters on this subject, so I'll direct a few questions your way:
1. How long have Europeans been in N American?
2. How long has the region incorporated within the Louisiana purchase been part of the USA?
3. How long has the southwest been part of the USA?
4. How long have the states of AK/HI been part of the USA?
The reason for these questions is that in the long run, the borders & racial makeup representing the ideals of this country have been in a constant state of flux.
Why should the dawn of the 21st century be any different? Who decided that history must stop? Now, I'm not advocating relinquishing the SW to Mexico. Rather, I'm asking the question: why don't we annex Mexico?
Who would be the winners in such an exchange? We would. Mexico has over 10k miles of virgin coastline. If there were title, financing, insurance & property protections, there would be an explosion of migration southward the likes the world has never seen.
The problem with looking at only one side of the amnesty bill is that we're playing the patsies. It's time to exert our historical dominance.