You're an idiot. Leave the censorship tactics to the "experts"; i.e., the Dhimmocrats. Let Ron Paul hang himself with his dumb remarks. Smart people will properly associate him w/ the Rosie O'Donnell Cult.
Ours is an exclusive club. No libertarians allowed.
I don’t agree with Paul on 9/11 or Iraq (although I do agree with him that we should have DECLARED WAR). However, silencing this man is not the answer - so much of what he says needs to be heard.
Good, the rest should be between Romney, Hunter, Rudy, & (Thompson, Gingrich if they are entering).
I think all candidates should be heard. If it’s too cumbersome to have them all on stage at once, split the debates up.
Well, I think Ron Paul is the worst candidate of the bunch. But how do you help matters by banning him from the debate? That’s the Democrat solution.
Mr. Anuzis, you're a freaking idiot. Try reading the 9/11 Commission report sometime you boob.
L
I would rather allow Run Paul to remove himself and he’s well on his way.
Ron Paul’s performance was absolute lunacy, but I don’t think he should be banned.
I personnally am glad I got to hear him so I can really appreciate what a complete jackass he is.
So what if our goals conflict with goals of Muslims. Are we supposed to give up our goals to please Muslims? Not. Let Muslims change their goals to please us.
Ron Paul has always been a Rosie O’Donnell with a male appendage, but censoring him does no good.
Let the nutburger spout his defeatist rhetoric so that voters can see for themselves for the neo-Chamberlain appeaser he really is.
Why stop with excluding Ron Paul?
We should start by excluding the 75 percent of Americans who oppose the War in Iraq.
Then, we should exclude those pro-choice on abortion Americans who are among the 25 percent of Americans who support the War in Iraq. (Starting with Rudy Guiliani.)
Then, we should exclude people like John McCain who, while they’re pro-war and pro-life, are soft on immigration.
I think these three simple steps would get the Republican Party down to where it could compete “mano a mano” with the Libertarian Party for 3th place, following the Dmocrats and the Greens, well ... at least in most states.
What an idiot.
Attention Mr. Saul Anuzis:
Sir, I totally disagree with your response to Ron Paul’s remarks. Your response highlights my immense frustration with the GOP both at the National level and the Illinois GOP too. Your response sounds way to much like the insipid nonsense we always hear from the DNC, Moveon.org and that ilk. Your response, in essence, says that the average GOP voter is not going to be able to grasp the concept that Paul was talking about, thus an elite political animal such as yourself must make that decision for us. Such a mentality it the very core of the religion of liberalism isn’t it? We common citizens are too stupid and too inept to make decisions for ourselves, no, we must depend on government and liberals to help us make better choices.
Mr. Anuzis please reconsider your reaction to Mr. Paul’s comments. Perhaps Paul’s statement is wacky and out of touch with reality. Perhaps not. It is not for you to decide for me how I will choose to react to such things. Let Mr. Paul particpate in the election process - let the voters decide Mr. Paul’s fate. That IS how a democracy works.
...or at least how repubicans view democracy...or used to.
I know that lots of people are sick and tired of Ron Paul and want him ended. That doesn't mean that they approve of him being executed, for instance...necessarily...
Perhaps the wisest words in rock lyrics, by Mick Jagger of all people: "You can't always get what you want." Grown-ups know this, Ron.
Prevent banning Ron Paul from the debates and support free speech while we still have the Constitution! Sign the Petition Here: http://www.petitiononline.com/r0npau1/petition.html