Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: 3AngelaD
The Bush administration supported the treaty, but the accord never reached the Senate floor due to opposition from conservatives concerned it would surrender U.S. sovereignty.

But now, Bush has a Congress he can work with, so he is again pushing to surrender U.S. sovereignty.

[And we though Clinton was a bad president.]
13 posted on 05/16/2007 8:21:53 AM PDT by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: TomGuy

Prelude: George H W Bush loses the 1992 election and is a lame-duck for 2 1/2 months
8888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888

snip:
President Bush signed the NAFTA agreement on December 17, 1992 at a meeting of the Organization of American States. The accord was signed prior to the expiration of the President’s negotiating authority, forcing Congress to either change its procedures or to consider NAFTA under fast track rules—which limits the amount of debate and requires lawmakers to vote up-or-down on the measure without amendments.

103rd Congress: President Clinton reiterated his desire to negotiate side agreements on NAFTA in the areas of safeguards, labor and environmental issues in January. Negotiations with Mexico and Canada began in the spring.

Anti-NAFTA forces—led by organized labor, some environmental activists, former presidential hopeful H. Ross Perot and consumer groups led by Ralph Nader—launched verbal attacks against the trade pact on Capitol Hill early and often in 1993, despite President Clinton’s efforts to allay their concerns. In related action, several House members with close ties to organized labor announced the formation of an “Anti-NAFTA Caucus” early in 1993. In July, more than 100 House and 7 Senate Democrats joined House Majority Leader David Bonior (D-MI-10) in urging President Clinton to postpone action on NAFTA until after Congress had completed work on health-care reform—a strategy that most NAFTA supporters believed would kill the trade pact. The White House responded that both NAFTA and health-care reform would be on the agenda in the fall.

Trade officials from the three NAFTA nations announced August 13 they had reached a deal on side agreements. Lawmakers returning home to their districts in August were barraged by anti-NAFTA sentiment. Many supporters of NAFTA returned to Washington publicly undecided on the pact. Convinced that NAFTA’s passage was contingent upon a strong push by the White House, dozens of House Republicans—led by Minority Leader Newt Gingrich (R-GA-6)—said they would withhold their support until the President demonstrated his commitment to the issue.

That commitment came September 14, 1993, when President Clinton—accompanied by former Presidents Ford, Carter and Bush—issued a strong statement of support for NAFTA.
http://www.nam.org/s_nam/doc1.asp?CID=201740&DID=223558

88888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888

Like father like son....(with the help of other lefties) our sovereignty is a goner!


19 posted on 05/16/2007 8:59:36 AM PDT by Vn_survivor_67-68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson