BIN LADEN'S FATWA (Why Ron Paul was Factually Correct) (UBL cited Iraq in 1996 Declaration of War)

PBS Online Newshour ^ | Unknown | PBS

[DAVEY CROCKETT]

try to prove that America “had it coming,”

---

That is not my point at all. My point was/is and will be that Bin laden in HIS thinking stated that HE was unhappy with America’s foreign policy.

I don't know what your point or misunderstanding is and don't even want to know, as my post wasn’t to you at all.

Never ever have I thought felt or said we “had it coming” those are YOUR and Bin Laden’s words. Not Mind. I spend all my time on FR on the World Terrorism thread sharing information and news. GOOD GREIF

[MitchellC]

That was not the intention behind my comment. (Although I do think that Ron Paul’s comments at the debate, particularly the part drawing moral equivalence between Muslim terrorism and Americans defending ourselves in a hypothetical attack from the Chinese, were dangerously close to the “we had it coming” way of thinking.)

[MNJohnnie]

So Ron Paul has more in common with Osama Bin Laden then he does with Ronald Reagan and you think that HELPS him?

Simply amazing how the very people who would be screaming “Traitor” if someone on the Left said this are busy manufacturing excuses for this lunatic.

Tehran Paul is actively propagandizing for Al Qeda. He not only is unfit for the Presidency, he is unfit to stay in Congress.

[rmlew]

India and Russia have been attacked. China actually has seen event it has described as terrorism. Whether this is islamist terrorism or justified Uyghur national resistance is another story.
However, you are utterly ignorant.

[rmlew]

Try again.
The US aided Al Qaeda's opposition within the Mujihadeen.
Our problem was not too much involvement, but too little. We essentually gave money to the Pakeistani ISI (their Islamist-controled CIA). The ISI created the Taliban and has helped Bin LAden.

You on the other hand are quoted communists.

[Erik Latranyi]

Yes; it does matter WHY they do things. It does not matter whether an opponent is evil or not; the Nazis were evil, and it definitely mattered WHY they did things.

Actually, according the distorted reality these Ron Paul idiots live within, the Nazi's were perfectly justified.

We left the German people broken, poor and helpless after WWI. Our actions against them are far, far worse than anything we have done in the middle east.

Of course, these useful idiots don't have the testicular fortitude to defend the Nazi's like they defend Al Qaeda.

[DAVEY CROCKETT]

We essentually gave money to the Pakeistani ISI (their Islamist-controled CIA). The ISI created the Taliban and has helped Bin LAden.
You on the other hand are quoted communists.

---

We essentially said the same thing. Post 260 explains all we know at this time history. See below post 260....

Do some research before you call me a communists.

I do more on FR to fight terrorism than you know. This is my ongoing thread...

World Terrorism: News, History and Research Of A Changing World #8 Security Watch
Posted on 04/15/2007 7:43:46 PM EDT by DAVEY CROCKETT

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/1817890/posts?q=1&;page=2851

With all this said would the 2 of you leave me alone or get on the ‘lets fight terrorism boat?’

[MitchellC]

(laugh) No one is stalking you. Stop trying to make yourself into a martyr over a friendly disagreement.

[Remember_Salamis]

He is not propagandizing for al-Qaida.

Is the prosecutor who is explaining the motive of a killer justifying the murder? Get Real! NeoConservatives crack me up. They'll sacrifice any and all liberties for a little military glory. It's probably because many of their loudest voices never serves.

If you think Iraq is such a splendid campaign, why don't you re-up, go back to bein' an 11-Bravo? If it's such a great cause, go for it!

[Remember_Salamis]

Erik, tell me how explaining somebody's motive for committing a crime is justifying said crime?

You are absolutely right -- We left the German people broken, poor and helpless after WWI. That was a contributing factor to the rise of the Nazis. But that does not justify their actions.

If you don't understand the difference between describing a criminal's motivations and justifying their actions, I feel sorry for you.

[rmlew]

I did not call you a communist. I noted that you were using communist new organs as sources.

[Erik Latranyi]

If you don't understand the difference between describing a criminal's motivations and justifying their actions, I feel sorry for you.

I understand the difference. Unfortunately, many politicians do not.

This is one of those cases.

[rmlew]

ping

[weegee]

Do you believe in a concept of “muslim lands”?

You realize that those who do are Islamic supremacists. They are just as against people of the same racial/national heritage who convert away from Islam as they are against “kufir” from the West.

Saying that “we shouldn’t be there” is to say that we have no right to be there. Like segregation much?

[erod]

ping for later