It is my humble opinion that Rudy can have nothing to do with domestic law enforcement. I like my guns too much. SecDef, SecState, or CIA.
After hearing Rudy’s stance on gun control, his ability to change his belief in what the Constitution means depending on who his employer is, his idead of eing a fiscal conservative as being one who slowed the growth of government, and his stance on immigration being issuing a national ID to law abiding people in order to find out who the criminals are (i.e. numbering the straw in the haystack while trying to find the needle), do you still think he should be AG?
AG is the better choice for Rudy, given his background coupled with his understanding of the realities of the WOT.
And unlike Gonzalez he can usually (but not always) be counted on to put together a coherent argument.
Plus, he’s a New Yorker who won’t put up with the kind of nonsense that the Dhimmi’s have been putting Gonzo through. I’d just love to see Pat Leahy try some of his stunts on Rudy!