To: mtnwmn
AG is the better choice for Rudy, given his background coupled with his understanding of the realities of the WOT.
And unlike Gonzalez he can usually (but not always) be counted on to put together a coherent argument.
Plus, he’s a New Yorker who won’t put up with the kind of nonsense that the Dhimmi’s have been putting Gonzo through. I’d just love to see Pat Leahy try some of his stunts on Rudy!
261 posted on
05/13/2007 10:17:24 AM PDT by
Phsstpok
(Often wrong, but never in doubt)
To: Phsstpok
My husband and I watched Rudy and Chris this AM and your last paragraph about Rudy being a NYer who won’t put up with a lot of sh— was my husband’s comment about him. We tend toward Thompson at least until we see him in debates with other candidates, but Rudy’s energy and forcefulness when he talks about implementing what needs to be done in a given situation, i.e. WOT or governing in NYC, is refreshing and reassuring when projecting him as CIC of this country. He puts whatever is his governing responsibility ahead of all else, whether it be NYC then, or the whole of America now. As the saying goes, Rudy will 'get er done'.
266 posted on
05/13/2007 10:31:27 AM PDT by
mountainfolk
(God Bless President George Bush)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson