Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Tribune7
Regardless, you missed the point. Atheists aren't anything new, although most probably think they are.

Well, atheism isn't new, but the world has changed and so has our understanding of it. In fact, some of Bacon's lines of argument against atheism have been rendered invalid by discoveries made since.

Two centuries ago, I would have been Christian for my whole life (even beyond the fact that I wouldn't have survived to my current age). So in a sense, there is a time-linked aspect to atheism...dogmatic and philosophic atheism has become supplemented by evidentiary atheism.

155 posted on 05/13/2007 5:15:31 PM PDT by Gondring (I'll give up my right to die when hell freezes over my dead body!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies ]


To: Gondring
Two centuries ago . . .

Why? How about two and a half centuries ago in time of Voltaire and Hume? Maybe two centuries ago people did become a little more enlightened with the atheist depravations of the atheistic French Revolution so apparent to the memory of most but then the depravations of atheistic Communism should be in yours.

The Bible actually looks more reliable today than then. Secular scholarship shows the writing to be reliable. The universe has been shown to have a beginning and end (unlike the learned consensus circa 1807) and life can't spontaneously generate.

And the Jews once again rule Israel.

182 posted on 05/13/2007 7:57:01 PM PDT by Tribune7 (A bleeding heart does nothing but ruin the carpet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson