“A nine-year-old passes the test for being out of the booster seat since he/she is older than eight.”
Then why are both of these girls in booster seats?
“Daughters Lexi, 8, and Karly, 10,”
And, if you read the law, as interpreted by this reporter, 8 years old should be the cutoff age. Not 9.
That's why I was questioning this article. It seems wrong on several fronts, thus making the author look stupid.
However, if the author merely mis-quoted the law (saying "or" instead of "and"), then I can understand a simple error. However that error is serious enough that it calls into question this article.