That's why I was questioning this article. It seems wrong on several fronts, thus making the author look stupid.
However, if the author merely mis-quoted the law (saying "or" instead of "and"), then I can understand a simple error. However that error is serious enough that it calls into question this article.
“However that error is serious enough that it calls into question this article.”
You’re right.
And it would also give parents and ‘out’ if they are ever ticketed for not having a child under the height of 4’9” in a booster.
Still a stupid law though.