To: SkyPilot
Why is this incident being treated as a “crime” instead of an act of war?
4 posted on
05/10/2007 3:39:36 AM PDT by
MrLee
To: MrLee
8 posted on
05/10/2007 3:49:40 AM PDT by
Kaslin
(Fred Thompson for President 2008)
To: MrLee
I think it may be because if it is an act of war’ in a legal sense the Geneva convention has to be invoked, Certainly that was the case in the UK where the Brit government refused to call the conflict with the IRA a ‘War”.
10 posted on
05/10/2007 4:26:50 AM PDT by
vimto
(Life is not a dry run.)
To: MrLee
Why is this incident being treated as a crime instead of an act of war?And who would you claim was the supporting state behind this group? Sort of need that to declare 'war' against someone (well unless you're the US government, they declare war on all sorts of nouns)
Course the description 'crime' itself may be a little too harsh when you look at some of the facts known about the case.
16 posted on
05/10/2007 6:25:03 AM PDT by
billbears
(Those who do not remember the past are condemned to repeat it. --Santayana)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson