No, your agenda, in this election, unfortunately, is ripping anyone to shreds who doesn't think exactly like you.
Well, I would say that that would be better than what you're doing: Supporting a lifelong liberal, one who implemented more of the Left's agenda in MA between 2002-2006 than any other liberal has ever affected anywhere in America.
From Janet Folger, President of Faith2Action, writing in World Net Daily --
I hasten to caution you about Mitt Romney.
In the debate when asked about how he feels if a Roman Catholic bishop were to deny communion to a pro-abortion Politician, he says : The Catholic Church can do whatever the heck it wants. Which seems to imply a separation of church and state.
But Just look at his record...
Then why did Romney:
1. Force Catholic hospitals in Massachusetts to hand out the abortion drug Plan B or close their doors?
2. Ignore the Catholic Action League who lobbied for a conscience clause so Catholic civil service workers wouldnt be forced to perform same-sex marriage ceremonies? Romneys position: Perform homosexual marriages or youre fired.
3. Tell Bostons largest adoption agency, Catholic Charities, they had to place vulnerable orphan children in the homes of homosexual activists or go out of business? Rather than bow to the Romney-enforced homosexual agenda, Boston Catholic Charities closed their doors. Even Michael Dukakis said Romney was wrong to force Catholics to violate their beliefs.
4. Force Catholics (and other pro-life people) to fund abortions in his (post-conversion) health-care plan that hes so very proud of?
And what about Terri Schiavo, who Romney agreed should be starved to death? She was a Catholic, too. As Ronald Reagan said, Facts are stubborn things. Sit down, Mr. Romney. I dont care whom youve paid to say nice things about you; youre disqualified.