Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Radix

yes radix, the ‘theory’ of evolution is scientific, while the ‘theory’ of creation isn’t- don’t ya know that only the congregation of evos are allowed theories? Don’t ya realize that only the congregation of evos are allowed to fit evidences and make wild leaps of judgements in efforts to connect dissimiliar species by pointing out a few similiarities in their DESIGNS? Don’t disparage ‘science’ by infering that other theories without the massive holes and impossibilities is a valid alternative to the dogmatic trasitionless theory of evo. Lightneining stuck some muck, single wrong-sided amino acids ‘created’ from this muck somehow avoided combining with the other handed amino acids that would have killed them all off when comming into contact with them, and then these wroinh-handed amino acids overcame impossible scenarios and somehow avoided the destructive energies of the world that surely would have killed anything off, then made impossible leaps to protiens and then went on to somehow induce an incredible amount of NEW unique information needed for macro-evolution to become man, and that is that- don’t ya understand?


58 posted on 05/09/2007 12:03:36 PM PDT by CottShop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]


To: CottShop
I heard a rumor once that on occasion during the intra cellular replication process certain misalignments can occur.

So then when the tDNA makes a “mistake” things can run a little amok at the other end.

Funny, I also heard that when such events do occur they are almost always “negative” in their impact to the particular organism.

I sort of think that what I heard was that whenever the little amino acids do not line up correctly, the result is called a “mutation” and my Biology teacher a long time ago before he died once said to me that “all mutations” result in a degrading of the individual species.

This is one of the things that has long confused me, because I had the notion in my head that things were getting better all of the time, especially among biological organisms.

So then, anyhow, many years later, I decided to take Biology Courses again.

Now of course they do things very different. They don’t teach about plants & animals anymore.

Now they teach about “molecules” and cellular function and energy consumption and the sliding scales of O2 and lots of big words and how they interact and ATP results and then you get “action potentials” and stuff happens and life goes on, and procreation results.

I truly enjoyed that business about the "punctuated equilibrium" because I learned a lot about the history of professional baseball when I perused through the writings of Stephen J. Gould. He was very big on that "modify" thingy.

Of course they have real evidence of “evolution” happening in front of our eyes because some finches get bigger populations when it rains out, and smaller populations when it doesn’t. They also have those mosquitoes in the London Subway System to prove” stuff to us great unwashed.

The thing is, any group who insists that other views should not be allowed, expressed, or taught in a public setting is guilty of censorship. Pure and simple.

Censorship.

There is nothing new under the Helios.

60 posted on 05/09/2007 12:46:06 PM PDT by Radix (I live my life like there is no yesterday!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson