Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: doc1019

SCOTUS said you can - Paula Jones case. An idiotic decision, IMO.


34 posted on 05/08/2007 7:32:34 PM PDT by PghBaldy (Reporter: Are you surprised? Nancy Pelosi: No. My eyes always look like this.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]


To: PghBaldy

They ruled that Clinton could be sued for actions before he was president, not actions while he was president and most importantly, not for actions AS president.


40 posted on 05/08/2007 7:35:17 PM PDT by Jean S
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

To: PghBaldy

IIRC, SCOTUS said that the Jones’ case would not interfere with the POTUS’ duties.

***For the record, I voted for Clinton twice, and thought he should have resigned when Lewinsky came up.


41 posted on 05/08/2007 7:36:14 PM PDT by PghBaldy (Reporter: Are you surprised? Nancy Pelosi: No. My eyes always look like this.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

To: PghBaldy

That was for actions unrelated to his presidential duties. You can’t sue a president for acting as president.


45 posted on 05/08/2007 7:39:29 PM PDT by Deb (Beat him, strip him and bring him to my tent!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

To: PghBaldy

SCOTUS proclaimed that the world at large could pursue a lawsuit against a president only after he left office.


47 posted on 05/08/2007 7:42:20 PM PDT by doc1019 (Fred Thompson '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

To: PghBaldy

The Jones suit pertained to an action that occurred BEFORE Slick became President. A standing President cannot be sued for actions taken while President.


222 posted on 05/09/2007 9:04:39 PM PDT by Hoodat ( ETERNITY - Smoking, or Non-smoking?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson