Skip to comments.
Pelosi threat to sue Bush over Iraq bill
The Hill ^
| 5/9/07
| Jonathan E. Kaplan and Elana Schor
Posted on 05/08/2007 7:07:38 PM PDT by Jean S
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180, 181-200, 201-220, 221-239 next last
To: teletech
What do you think the US supreme Court would do with her suit? It depends on who "encouraged" Justice O'Kennedy the night before the ruling.
181
posted on
05/09/2007 8:10:51 AM PDT
by
Christian4Bush
(Dennis Miller said it best “Liberals always feel your pain. Unless of course, they caused it.”)
To: All; prairiebreeze
182
posted on
05/09/2007 8:16:49 AM PDT
by
ALOHA RONNIE
("ALOHA RONNIE" Guyer/Veteran-"WE WERE SOLDIERS" Battle of IA DRANG-1965 http://www.lzxray.com)
To: JeanS
Amazing...just amazing....
The level to which these Rats stoop for their political agenda....why oh why were they voted into office???
Are people really that naive to think they help this country? /rhetorical question
183
posted on
05/09/2007 8:18:32 AM PDT
by
Lucky9teen
(Those that fail to learn from history, are doomed to repeat it.)
To: JeanS
Good luck with that, Pelosi. ::Snicker::
184
posted on
05/09/2007 8:20:27 AM PDT
by
MEGoody
(Ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.)
To: TheLion
Pelosi and company will fight this all the way to hell, caring nothing about our troops.They will lose, and they will do more to help a Republican get elected as President in 2008 than anything Republicans could do.
185
posted on
05/09/2007 8:21:45 AM PDT
by
MEGoody
(Ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.)
To: JeanS
Can I threaten to sue Pelosi over the fact that she’s a seditious moron?
186
posted on
05/09/2007 8:21:55 AM PDT
by
SoldierDad
(Proud Father of a 2nd BCT 10th Mountain Soldier fighting the terrorists in Iraq)
To: SirJohnBarleycorn
If Nancy Pelosi wishes to sue President Bush for failing to enforce a law, how about suing him for failing to enforce the laws regarding our border and immigration?
I concur...that would be the ONLY thing she has to sue on...
187
posted on
05/09/2007 8:25:38 AM PDT
by
Lucky9teen
(Those that fail to learn from history, are doomed to repeat it.)
To: JeanS; doc1019
188
posted on
05/09/2007 8:43:49 AM PDT
by
Lucky9teen
(Those that fail to learn from history, are doomed to repeat it.)
To: PA-RIVER
189
posted on
05/09/2007 8:57:33 AM PDT
by
Lucky9teen
(Those that fail to learn from history, are doomed to repeat it.)
To: Berosus; Convert from ECUSA; dervish; Ernest_at_the_Beach; Fedora; Fred Nerks; KlueLass; ...
190
posted on
05/09/2007 9:35:53 AM PDT
by
SunkenCiv
(Time heals all wounds, particularly when they're not yours. Profile updated May 7, 2007.)
To: TheRobb7
All of what you say is true. I wonder if the use of 'signing statements' is an end run around the fact that there is no 'line item veto'. In 1998 the USSC declared the 'line item veto' unconstitutional ... it would take a Constitutional amendment. The court said that the "unilateral amendment or repeal of only parts of statutes violated the US Constitution." "Signing statements" accomplish the same effect.
Don't get me wrong I'd like to see the PORK and BS in Congressional passed legislation stopped. But it needs to be done in accordance with the Constitution or its Amendments. [Just me thinking out loud.]
191
posted on
05/09/2007 9:45:07 AM PDT
by
K-oneTexas
(I'm not a judge and there ain't enough of me to be a jury. (Zell Miller, A National Party No More))
To: JeanS
Demand of your U.S. Rep. that she be CENSURED.
192
posted on
05/09/2007 9:45:33 AM PDT
by
polymuser
(There is one war and one enemy.)
To: jveritas
google the Copperheads in the Civil War...
193
posted on
05/09/2007 9:53:14 AM PDT
by
Ernest_at_the_Beach
(The DemonicRATS believe ....that the best decisions are always made after the fact.)
To: JeanS; Gritty
194
posted on
05/09/2007 9:54:32 AM PDT
by
Ernest_at_the_Beach
(The DemonicRATS believe ....that the best decisions are always made after the fact.)
To: JeanS
195
posted on
05/09/2007 10:04:28 AM PDT
by
bnelson44
(http://www.appealforcourage.org)
To: Chgogal
So, I think we can ignore the Loser's opinions and writings. Thanks for the good words. I do think we know that we can ignore Peloser. The problem is, our media does not ignore her.
196
posted on
05/09/2007 10:40:56 AM PDT
by
do the dhue
(May God have mercy upon my enemies, because I wont - George S. Patton Jr)
To: DakotaRed
I realize Pelosi probably shook hands with the Queen of EnglandNancy: I'm Nancy Pelosi, and you're sitting in my chair.
To: JeanS
Aw, Nancy, shaddup and go get another botox injection.
To: 2ndDivisionVet
She’s dangerous. Enough that she’s a power-mad libRAT, she’s stupid too and that’s scary.
199
posted on
05/09/2007 10:57:58 AM PDT
by
Fudd Fan
(Armed men are citizens. Unarmed men are subjects. Gun control is about CONTROL.)
To: JeanS
Get the wench a padded room!
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180, 181-200, 201-220, 221-239 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson